On this day, April 19, 2010, Jorge Ortiz-Oliva, the kingpin of one of the biggest drug organizations in Oregon history, was sentenced to 30 years in prison.
Celebrated on the anniversary of June 19, 1865, when in the wake of the American Civil War, Major General Gordon Granger ordered the final enforcement of the Emancipation Proclamation in Texas.
Editor's note: This is the first of a three-part series on the collapse of small business in Oregon and is reprinted with permission from the blog of Echo Alexzander. She and her husband owned FIRST Corvallis, a massage therapy clinic
Most people are likely aware that so many small businesses have struggled in 2020. But have you talked with them (if you aren't one of them)? Do you understand how they were (or continue to be) impacted? What about those who lost all? I would like to share our journey not because it is easy to talk about, but in hopes that it might educate and inspire change in 2021 and beyond.
This series wasn't easy to write or share, but it feels so necessary. We must all understand the reality of this situation to immediately put a stop to it. And more importantly, to never allow it to happen again in our great nation.
Disclaimer: This is a real-life example of one family-owned small-business in the service sector in Oregon, USA. The details shared here are to help educate the public and provide an inside look to those who may be far removed from these realities.
How did our business start out in 2020?
How did our business start out in 2020?
We had long ago survived the initial hurdles in the start-up years. "Only 78.5% of small businesses survive their first year" and we were well past that point with eight years in full-time practice.
Our hard work and success had resulted in over 1,300 clients for one practitioner. To give perspective on this volume in terms of day to day customers, before 2020 an average return customer appointment waitlist was about a month for their next appointment. New patients usually had to wait closer to two months to get their first appointment. So there was high and consistent demand for services.
Knowing we had become well established, we had weathered the ups and downs, and we had learned how to strategize between high and low seasons, what could there be to fear?
Unforeseen Circumstances
As 2020 was unfolding we had frequent conversations with people about the situation we were up against as small business owners. A comment we heard was how 'annoying' or 'inconvenient' it must have been during the shutdowns, as though they had been some loosely defined recommendations. I found myself correcting them to clarify that our business was made illegal by the Governor of our State as a non-essential business by the end of March.
This could hardly be viewed as a slowdown in business, or a seasonal occurrence we could prepare ourselves for. So how did it get to that point?
Executive Order No. 20-12 effective March 24th, 2020 our business was among a list that the Oregon Governor prohibited under penalty of Class C misdemeanor if found in violation and convicted. How could we now be at risk to face jail time if found in violation of what was, as of yesterday, operating our business to provide for our family?
Wait, what?!? A Class C Misdemeanor?
“Under Oregon law, a Class C misdemeanor is punishable by up to 30 days in jail, a fine of up to $1,250, or both.â€
Crimes defined as Class C Misdemeanors include:
Most Traffic Tickets
Disorderly conduct
Public intoxication
Bad Checks of less than $20
Simple assault
Criminal trespassing
Gambling
Bail jumping
Leaving a child in a vehicle
Petty theft including shoplifting of an item under $50
Possession of alcoholic beverages in a motor vehicle
Minor driving under the influence of alcohol
Minor in possession of alcohol
Minor in possession of tobacco
Possession of drug paraphernalia
So surely there must be a plan for all of those impacted by this government action, right?
How can an Emergency be Indefinite?
At the time this was issued the Oregon EO 20-12 was indefinite until terminated. There was no cutsie ‘two-weeks to hold on tight’ catch-phrase offered by the Governor to businesses to help them know how to react (not that it apparently helped any Oregonians since the two-weeks is looking to stretch a year).
This was with no end in sight. You have lost your ability to legally earn a living while still being financially liable for all your prior expenses. How does a business prepare themselves financially or psychologically to be made illegal to operate a mere 20 days after the declaration of a State-level emergency? And for a potentially indefinite period of time.
Where is this in business risk planning scenarios or modeling exercises in school? I have a business degree and can assure you that this wasn't on the menu. When did a service sector business think, 'someday, it might be a crime in my state to have close personal contact with other humans', and if it does, how will I "pivot" to online in order to succeed like other sectors? This EO 20-12 impacted 42 total sub-industries by name in our state, think how many businesses those entire industries represented?
It ended up lasting just under 68 days in total. For 68 days, due to no fault of our own, our business was simply not allowed by our state government to legally operate. Two months and one week we waited. We paid all of our bills, so those we owed didn't feel any impact, at least not from our business. And we received no outside support, we simply watched our savings drain away.
But there were government bailouts coming, weren't there?
Surely There Was State Funding!
There was a period where independent contractors were able to apply for unemployment (which my husband qualified as) under the PUA, but due to the brokenness of the Oregon Employment Department system, it was badly delayed (it began in August after the impact in March), and very little paid out in comparison to what my husband both qualified and applied for. It lasted four weeks and paid him $1,352 in total when all was said and done.
Our example business overhead in a four-week period run closer to $3,200 not including payroll or retirement contributions. Don’t forget any, examples of these expenses for a business include things like: office supplies, medical insurance premiums, power, internet, software, email, credit card processing, and website fees, business insurance, rent, sewer, city water, natural gas, bottled water service, payroll tax (yes, even when you have $0 payroll period there is still tax and filing fees due, not including the bookkeeping and CPA expenses) and legal services.
What about all those other alphabet acronym funding sources the news was always talking about?
What About All of Those Other Support Programs?
PPP - This was not applicable to our particular situation/business so we were unable to apply.
EIDL - We were awarded $1k in 'potentially forgivable' support (originally it was a loan meaning that it drove our business into debt). Of that money, we would then owe $332 taxes, be able to use $418 for payroll, and the remaining $250 could be applied to other overhead expenses (think utilities, etc).
CARES Act - Oregon was the last state in the union to pay theirs out to citizens. Even though they received these funds from the Federal government at the same time as all of the other states, the Governor opted to hold the funds throughout the year and finally released funding in late November 2020.
None of this money was given for the independent contractor claim that James had filed. For those who did qualify, these payments began coming as early as 11/20. However, the reality for so many was that was too late. In our example, we gave notice to our clients on 11/14 that we would close our doors forever in Oregon on 12/31. How many others weren't able to hold on as long as we were?
Benton Country where our business operated offered two grant options from the total $55M in state-level funding. These funds if awarded would act as non-repayment, taxable income. In the end, they funded only 25% of those over 300 businesses who applied (image right).
A threat to the future of private schools, religious freedom, parental rights and school choice.
The Senate Interim Committee on Education Chaired by Senator Michael Dembrow (D-Portland) introduced SB 223, which requires private school registration with the Oregon Department of Education (ODE) if they want their students to participate in interscholastic sports or activities with public schools. This is the latest attack on schools outside the public system, an attack against school choice.
This bill came out of the blue with no mention at the fall committee meeting. The take-away from that meeting was the anti-choice sediment expressed by one Senator eluding to choice as a white-privilege. Not all members agreed, but perhaps “choice†was translated to “private schools,†That still doesn’t explain requiring private schools to report and submit for approval on the following:
Curriculum
Student behavior & discipline policies
Instructional time
Student mental health & abuse investigation
Facility health and safety
Teacher competency & background checks
Currently, ODE policy states: “non-public education is recognized as a vital part of Oregon’s educational system. Private schools do not have to register with the State of Oregon, unless they are contracting with public school district for services.†SB 223 would change this and would require private schools to register with ODE annually.
Over 50,000 Oregon students choose private schools, primarily for the added religious curriculum. Should the state have approval over religious curriculum?
The Supreme Court has upheld parents’ First and Fourteenth Amendment rights as they relate to education. The First Amendment grants parents the right to choose education for their children that doesn’t interfere with their religious beliefs. The Fourteenth Amendment protects parents’ rights to direct the education of their children and ensures that differences between public and private school cannot be eradicated. State regulation of private education must be reasonable and not without limits. If private schools need ODE approval for all plans and procedures, they would become de facto public schools.
The bill states, “The unique qualities of private education while seeking to further the educational opportunities of students enrolled in private schools.†By limiting the participation in interscholastic activities to private schools that are registered, it creates a problem that they propose to solve by requiring registration.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
SB 223 is a threat to the future of private schools, religious freedom, parental rights and school choice. It undermines the broad educational goals of private education as well as essentially eliminate private schools’ jurisdiction over their own schools.
The bill is scheduled for a public hearing in the Senate Committee On Education on March 17 at 3:15 PM.
With SB 683 our schools would teach a curriculum of history based on racism. The plan is to make it part of the 1619 project which celebrates the arrival of the first slaves in North America. SB 683 was introduced by Senators Lew Frederick (D-Portland) and Rob Wagner (D-Lake Oswego).
Why don’t they teach a true history of racism? Begin with the Egyptians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Arabic lands, India, isolated empirical China and Japan then follow it to its expansion into the America’s with some historical context.
Why would the curriculum begin near the historical end of slavery in 1619 and not include 5500 years of earlier activity? Perhaps the reason is political. Some think it is nothing more than revised history by omission.
Slavery didn’t start in the U.S. It all but ended here. In Oregon the native tribes held rendezvous at Celilo Falls and Willamette Falls into the time of the white man’s arrival. The Modoc tribe would sell Paiute prisoners into slavery at those annual gatherings. One slave for a horse or three blankets. Mexican cartels sell young girls into slavery currently and that sex trade has accelerated with more border crossings facilitated under our new administration. In many Muslim countries today, women are second class citizens living lives tantamount to slavery. China has slave labor camps to reprogram nonconforming religious and dissident citizens. We are told those are OK because it is a cultural thing.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
The industrial Revolution did more to end slavery than any other single event. When machines were invented that did more work of a reliable quality than humans could do the economic necessity for slavery was gone. Why don’t schools teach our kids that it was President Thomas Jefferson that banned the importation of slaves in 1809? Maybe the course should examine the slavery that controls the actions of people once they are made to be economically and psychologically dependent on government.
The greatest deterrent to slavery is a population that believes in the pursuit of self-sufficiency. What are we doing to teach self-sufficiency?
Oregon Governor Kate Brown announced plans for an executive order that would bring some certainty to parents and kids who are suffering under school closures, including a planned return to in-person instruction. Governor Brown has been under pressure from students, parents and Republican lawmakers to open schools to increased in-person instruction, in the face of opposition from teachers' unions.
Senate Republican Leader Fred Girod (R-Lyons) issued the following statement:
“For weeks, Senate Republicans have been standing up for students and families who have been left behind by school closures. Thousands have spoken out, marched, and demonstrated for their education. We elevated their pain and stories that have been ignored for too long.
“The Governor’s planned executive order is a step in the right direction to give our students the education they deserve. It is our responsibility as legislators to ensure the Governor delivers on her promises. We know hybrid instruction still is not the best option for students. We look forward to holding the Governor accountable for returning all of our students to in-person classroom instruction.â€
In response to this pressure, and despite the pushback from teachers' unions, Governor Kate Brown announced today she will be issuing an executive order to return Oregon public school students to the classroom. In a letter to the Oregon Health Authority and the… , she directed all Oregon public schools to offer universal access to in-person instruction on or before the weeks of March 29 for K-5 students and April 19 for students in grades 6-12.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
"Thanks to the smart choices Oregonians have made, our COVID-19 numbers have declined. All but six counties now meet or exceed Oregon’s advisory metrics for a return to in-person, hybrid learning for all K-12 grade levels,†said Governor Brown. "And, five of those counties meet the advisory metrics for a return to elementary school."
“The science is very, very clear: with proper safety measures in place, there is a low risk of COVID-19 transmission in school. Oregon parents can be confident about sending their children back to a classroom learning environment.â€
After the weeks of March 29 and April 19, all public schools in Oregon will operate under either a fully on-site or a hybrid instructional model when counties meet or exceed Oregon’s advisory COVID-19 metrics. Individual students or parents who want to remain in comprehensive distance learning, or who have health needs, may do so. Comprehensive distance learning for all will be an option for school districts when community transmission rates of COVID-19 warrant a transition, as determined by state or local public health directives. No later than March 19, the Oregon Health Authority and Oregon Department of Education will issue updated guidance to match the directives set out by the Governor.
Continued Governor Brown: “Closing schools in Oregon is a decision I will never forget. Parents, educators, school staff, but especially students have come so far while navigating the challenges of this pandemic. Welcoming students back to every school across Oregon will be a milestone worth celebrating."
Community calls for a stop to vandalism and senseless destruction
In response to community concerns about the rise in violence in Portland, and the calls to increase public safety and respond to calls in a timely manner, the Portland Police Bureau will take steps over the next two days to provide additional officers to respond to incidents of violence and public disorder.
Eight officers from the Enhanced Community Safety Team (ECST) will work Friday and Saturday evening with the express purpose of following up on shootings that have occurred and responding as quickly as possible to calls. ECST officers will enhance the work already being done by patrol officers.
Police response to shooting calls, especially when there are gunshot victims, takes multiple officers to locate fleeing suspects, render aid until medical help arrives, secure the scene, preserve evidence, and contact witnesses.
"The Enhanced Community Safety Team officers will focus on high visibility and an enhanced police response to incidents of gun violence in progress," said Assistant Chief of Investigations Jami Resch. "Their priority will be apprehending those engaged in this violence which threatens the safety of our community."
The Portland Police Bureau now claims it has listened to community members' calls for a stop to vandalism and senseless destruction that has occurred periodically over the last several months.
Portland Police will deploy additional uniform presence from its three precincts to keep watch in areas commonly targeted by vandals and respond quickly to any calls of public disorder. The community has expressed its desire for peace and safety in neighborhoods and shopping districts city-wide, and these additional officers are intended to be responsive to those concerns.
"Students are facing mental health issues, peer suicides, and social isolationâ€
Several House and Senate Republicans have sent a letter to Oregon Governor Kate Brown, requesting that she "take decisive action and reopen Oregon schools for full in-person instruction immediately."
The letter begins, "As House and Senate Republicans, we are deeply concerned about the detrimental impacts ongoing school closures are having on Oregon students. We respectfully request that you utilize the full authority of the Office of the Governor and intervene immediately to reopen schools to full in-person instruction."
As the governor has tried to steer between the demands of teachers' unions, upset parents and students, increasingly damaged by the disruption of school closures, pressure has been mounting for schools to re-open. In a move that many saw as a policy punt, the governor issued guidelines that allowed schools to partially self-determine their own opening schedule.
The letter references the nearly half-billion dollar federal grant, directed at opening schools, "The state was recently allocated $499 million from the federal government, much of which was intended to get children back into the classroom. We find no reason that this funding windfall is not sufficient to reopen schools, especially when an ever-increasing body of evidence supports that it is safe -- even without the vaccination of teachers."
In a sad note, the letter says that "Students are facing challenges associated with mental health, peer suicides, and social isolation while not at school. Our kids need to be back in the classroom to have the necessary support. Last year, we saw nearly a 40% increase in calls to suicide hotlines among youth. A recent survey shows that over half of 11-17-year-olds reported having suicidal thoughts regularly.
The bill characterizes the history of Oregon and U.S. History as racist
The first “Whereas†in SB 683 states: “Whereas the first slaves from Africa were brought to North America in 1619, beginning a 400-year history of racism toward Black Americans.â€
The Smithsonian writes that “the misguided focus on 1619 as the beginning of slavery in the U.S. damages our understanding of American history.â€
Senators Lew Frederick (D-Portland) and Rob Wagner (D-Lake Oswego) would like you to believe that SB 683 presents a truth in racial history and it influenced the foundation of law in the U.S. Constitution. Reading thirteen “Whereas†relating to instruction on racist history, there are a number of questions a student should ask. Is this a fair and balanced view of history? Why does the U.S. Constitution mimic the Bible, which rebukes slavery by force? Northwest Observer’s article on “Democrats and the Scar of Racism,†debunks a number of the “Whereas†that leads into SB 683.
Oregonians for Liberty in Education points out that the language in the bill seems to blindly copy the premises of the widely debunked New York Times 1619 Project. If enacted, this bill would mandate the statewide adoption of a 1619 Project-type curriculum for all K-12 Oregon public school students. The bill characterizes the overarching theme of Oregon and U.S. History as racist. It would require all history to be taught through an oppressed/oppressor racial lens. It requires a radical overhaul of the 5th Grade Oregon Trail Unit to characterize all pioneers as motivated chiefly by racism. It describes racism and slavery as foundational to the state and country’s law, economy, justice system, and government.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
The Majority Party agenda this session is all about equality of their own definition. It appears in bills from recycling to taxation to land use, and of course education. This bill states: “Prepare students to confront the immorality of this country’s racist history and to reflect on the causes and manifestations of that racist history.†But, it doesn’t stop with what we learn from history, the curriculum would explore the various mechanisms of transitional and restorative justice that would help Black Americans move forward in the aftermath of racist history.
A mandatory curriculum with no balanced agenda for objective discussion is indoctrination, not equity. It degrades white students to appease adults looking for revenge.
Public hearing on SB 683 on Wednesday, March 10 at 3:15pm.
“If Brown ‘followed the science’, Oregonians would not be subjected to theseâ€
Today, Senator Dennis Linthicum (R-Klamath Falls) issued a statement about Governor Kate Brown extending her emergency orders under the guise of COVID-19 safety measures, even as COVID-19 is undergoing a dramatic decline in Oregon.
Senator Linthicum said:
“The COVID-19 ‘emergency’ is over. However, Governor Kate Brown’s unconstitutional government overreach and unscientific emergency orders that undermine Oregonians at every turn will be continuing. The never-ending emergency declarations create a perpetual excuse for bureaucratic expansion that robs Oregonians of their livelihoods and forces every person to adapt to a lower quality of life.
“If Gov. Brown truly ‘followed the science’, Oregonians would not be subjected to these bogus emergency orders which grant the governor the power to decree the closures of industries, schools and daily life on a whim and under the guise of ‘safety’.
“The statistics show that seasonal influenza has all but disappeared in Oregon as every sniffle, cold and headache has been lumped into the COVID-19 money-pot. They say the flu has disappeared due to masking and social distancing, yet in the same breath we are told we need to be doing more including wearing two or three masks. It doesn’t make sense, but that is the point. Gov. Brown and her cronies continue to instill chaos and concern to maintain unchecked power. This is not an idle accusation. Right now, our national COVID-19 effort has cost more than our entire experience in World War II, while COVID-19 antibody testing data suggests the case fatality rate is far lower than reported. These data suggest there are far better ways to keep people from dying than full-scale draconian lockdowns.
“It is time for Oregonians to stand against Gov. Brown’s power-hungry emergency orders that needlessly infringe on our communities, shutter our businesses and lead to the destruction of livelihoods and our society.â€
While observing committee hearings in the virtual Oregon 2021 Legislative session, the staff here at the Northwest Observer came across the House Business and Labor hearing on March 1, 2021. The public is still not allowed to attend hearings in person, and video is the only way that a member of the public may witness.
The start of the video on OLIS was clunky and apparently the “blue light†that indicates to the committee, staff and others the hearing is now “live†to the public, came on before the chair of the committee, Rep. Paul Holvey (D-Eugene) knew he was live.
We don’t know what was said before the blue light came on but, noticed that the members were apparently discussing something that led to the opening exchange between Rep. Shelly Boshart Davis (R-Tangent) and the chair.
State legislators are required to take several hours of mandatory training on sexual harassment, workplace behavior and more.
In this video, an older, white male Democrat leader seems to be what we would call “aggressive†toward a younger female member. Watch the body language of Boshart Davis after the chair’s comment. Women will immediately notice the noticeably discomfort she is experiencing.
It appears that Democrat men in the Legislature (Diego Hernandez, David Gomberg and Paul Holvey) have a problem that the mandatory training is not addressing. They are aggressive toward younger women.
The reporting staff here at the Northwest Observer believe that House Speaker Tina Kotek should open an investigation from the Legislative Equity Office and its Director Jackie Sandmeyer into this video. And believe that Rep. Holvey should be brought before the Rule 27 Conduct Committee.
If this had been a Republican male making such remarks and aggressive behavior toward a younger female member of the House Democrat caucus, this would be “front page news†in all of the Portland media. We understand that Rep. Holvey most likely did not mean anything by his remarks, but in this day and age of #MeToo and #TimesUp, we must hold people accountable for actions such as these. We hope that at the very least a public apology will come from the chair of the Business and Labor committee, preferably on the floor of the Oregon House.
Newberg Pool Congested Zone of the Willamette River has long been a contentious issue between property owners and boaters. The 20 river miles has some of the most unique boating regulations in the state due to it popularity in the summer and shoreline development.
From 2010 to 2019 the Marine Board held unlimited number of hearing and discussions with stakeholders on both sides to come to an agreed plan and adopt administrative rules. The rules restrict wakesports to approximately 3 miles with various distances from docks for wake surfing and waterskiing.
In 2019, legislation passed requiring wakesports to complete an education course and maintain a Towed Watersports Education Endorsement and a Towed Watersports Motorboat Certificate decal. Additionally, rules set a maximum loading weight of motorboats at 10,000 pounds for applicants seeking the certification decal.
Boats over that weight cannot be used for wakesports in the Newberg Pool. The Board has issued 631 Towed Watersports Education Endorsement and 406 are issued a Towed Watersports Motorboat Certificate. The average loading weight of these boats is 5,079 lbs.
Representatives Witt and Meek didn’t do their research before proposing these bills.
Manufactures are not required to specify the weight of boats they build. Boats specifically designed for wakesports typically provide the weight, but other watercraft that is often used for wakesports don't have a factory loading weight. It will make it a guessing game to register.
Shouldn’t the study come first to justify reducing the weight?
Out of the 406 certificates issued about 188 are 4,000 pounds or less. Wakesports is limited to a three mile stretch with strict distant limitations from residential docks. There is no justification for banning 218 legally permitted craft from wakesports.
If the State Marine Board conducts a study on increasing the maximum loading weight, the 218 boat owners would have an opportunity to be a part of the discussion and not be blindsided by these bills.
As it stands now, both bills have amendments that virtually ban all water craft from the 26-55 mile markers on the river.
The Marion County Commissioners have sent a letter to the members of the Oregon House Committee on Housing, expressing their opposition to HB 2100. The base bill itself just calls for a study on housing, but the real purpose of the bill is to be a placeholder for the -1 Amendments which replace the contents of the base bill, in a "gut and stuff" maneuver with 13 pages of directives for Oregon's Housing and Community Services agency.
The bill has no official legislative sponsor, but the text indicates that it was introduced at the request of Governor Kate Brown for Housing and Community Services Department.
The letter, signed by all three Commissioners and focusing on funding, says that "Marion County opposes HB 2100, which would disinvest in our local solutions for existing emergency housing needs and homeless services. The Commissioners are Kevin Cameron (R-Salem), Colm Willis (R-Stayton) and Danielle Bethell (R-Keizer).
The letter continues:
"HB 2100 is Oregon Housing and Community Services' effort to modernize Oregon's homeless response system. This modernization includes moving funding for homeless services towards an outcomes-based system, allows for intentional initiatives to address homelessness, and changes the way funding is allocated for homeless services.
"Oregon's current delivery system utilizes a needs-based formula to allocate resources directly to Community Action Agencies around the state. The Mid-Willamette Valley Community Action Agency (MWVCAA) receives $2,391,915 to provide critical services and coordination of services to persons experiencing poverty, housing instability, and homelessness in Marion County. MWVCAA's ability to build a network and coordinate services across organizations has been an integral strategy to our region's approach to addressing homelessness and housing instability. The proposed modernization would continue the needs-based approach and maintain regional allocations but restrict MWVCAA 's guaranteed allotment to 80%; the remaining 20% of funds would be made available on a competitive basis to all providers statewide with no guarantee of funds being directed to needs in our county."
HB 2100 has had one public hearing, but the amendment has not yet been adopted. It has not currently been scheduled for further action.
Oregon House Republicans today urged Legislative Democrats to
abandon a massive proposed tax increase on beer and wine in favor of policies that
would support the recovery of the restaurant and adult beverage industry amid the
ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Republican lawmakers contrasted a recently introduced
proposal that would exponentially increase taxes on beer and wine producers in Oregon
with Washington State’s recent decision to adopt a one-time waiver for liquor licenses in
the state.
“No industry has been hit harder by the pandemic than the restaurant and hospitality
industry, and by extension the producers of adult beverages,†said Rep. David Brock
Smith (R-Port Orford).
“In Washington, a bipartisan group of lawmakers had the
common sense to provide some measure of relief to this industry. Unfortunately, here in
Oregon, House Democrats have embraced the opposite approach to an extreme degree
by proposing to increase taxes on beer by 2800% and wine by 1700%. At a time when so
many of these businesses are struggling to keep their doors open or have closed
permanently and hurt hardworking employees and their families, moving forward with
a proposal like this makes no sense.â€
According to reports, Washington’s bill could save restaurants as much as $2,500.
HB 3296 introduced by Representatives Tawnya Sanchez (D-Portland) and Rachel Prusak (D-West Linn), would increase the tax per barrel on beer from $2.60
to $72.60.
The bill would increase the price per barrel of wine from $0.65 to $10.65.
“It’s really striking to see the difference between how our two states are treating this
vital industry right now,†said Rep. Bill Post (R-Keizer).
“Instead of pursuing outrageous
tax hikes, I urge my Democratic colleagues to look for opportunities to support
restaurants and producers and to help these businesses recover from the impacts of the
pandemic and government shutdown orders.â€
HB 3296 was formally introduced in the Oregon House on February 23, 2021. The bill
has not yet been scheduled for a public hearing.
After the weeks of March 29 and April 19, all public schools in Oregon will operate under either a fully on-site or a hybrid instructional model when counties meet or exceed Oregon’s advisory COVID-19 metrics. Individual students or parents who want to remain in comprehensive distance learning, or who have health needs, may do so. Comprehensive distance learning for all will be an option for school districts when community transmission rates of COVID-19 warrant a transition, as determined by state or local public health directives. No later than March 19, the Oregon Health Authority and Oregon Department of Education will issue updated guidance to match the directives set out by the Governor.
HB 2100 has had one public hearing, but the amendment has not yet been adopted. It has not currently been scheduled for further action.
