On January 6, 2021, four Brunson Brothers watched in dismay as 387 members of Congress along with Vice President Mike Pence voted against the proposition to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election. Deron Brunson had begun suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in the financial world and his experience gave them confidence to sue the current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

The Brothers filed two identical lawsuits, one being held up in the Utah Federal Court, but the other, filed by Raland J. Brunson has made it to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), Docket #22-380.

What makes this case newsworthy is that SCOTUS has received the case as a national security filing on an expedited basis and bypassed the 10th Circuit Court using Rule 11, even though the 10th Circuit Court denied the case after the fact. Because it was received as a national security, the court can bypass setting a docket time and could hear it at any time on a minute’s notice or dismiss the case for no national security.

SCOTUS has taken a national emergency case specific to whether the 388 named defendants violated their oath to protect the Constitution and the American people. “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

If, to protect the country and its citizens, a 10-day investigation was legally and lawfully required, then their oath was violated. On that basis alone, regardless of the outcome of the election, the consequence is their removal from office and losing all eligibility to run again, plus their actions are nullified as if the election never happened.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the Solicitor General of the United States, representing the 388 defendants for breaking their oath of office, responded on Thanksgiving Day that they waived their right to respond on the case. In effect, they told SCOTUS to go forward. SCOTUS has listed it on the docket ensuring a hearing.

There is case precedent in 1877 when the U.S. Supreme Court and five Representatives and Senators took a 10-day pause to investigate to determine the election was correct. Senator Cruz of Texas used this precedent to make his proposal to Congress that an Electoral Commission be immediately appointed “with full investigatory and fact-finding authority to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states.”

If SCOTUS rules in favor of the plaintiffs, it will not affect any down ballot elections or the 2022 elections. It does remove two-thirds of Congress to never run for office again and will affect the jobs of around 12,000 staff. Because it would render the vote never happened, President Trump would resume as President.

Oregon would lose Representatives Suzanne Bonamici and Earl Blumenauer, and Senators Jeff Merkley and Ron Wyden voting against the 10-day investigation forfeiting their right to run for another term.

The Supreme Court is set to meet on January 6. The Brunsons are requesting help suggesting people print and mail a letter to the Supreme Court regarding Brunson v. Alma S. Adams et al.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2022-12-06 18:20:15

Last Update: 2022-12-07 14:24:48