Says no to closing 176,000 acres
From the plush office in Portland, environmental nonprofits Oregon
Natural Desert Association (ONDA), the Audubon Society of Portland, and
Defenders of Wildlife, are trying to dictate land management in Eastern
Oregon.
It’s no wonder residents of eight Eastern Oregon counties have
voted to join the “Greater Idaho†movement. Their goal is to break lose
of this Metro run state, and be recognized that their livelihood is
needed to sustain Metro.
ONDA attorney, Mac Lacy, has made his career with his eyes on
eastern Oregon’s public lands, wilderness and imperiled species.
Recently his aim is protecting Oregon’s vast sagebrush landscape for
the sage grouse.
Representing ONDA, Lacy’s latest effort is to chase ranchers from
rangeland by filing a temporary restraining order and preliminary
injunction against grazing on 13 Oregon pastures.
The case is against
BLM and Cahill Ranches to accelerate a 2015 Oregon Greater Sage-
Grose Record of Decision/Approved Resource Management Plan
Amendment (ARPMA), a conservation plan for Research Natural Areas
(RNAs) that prohibits grazing in 13 pastures to allow for research on the
sage grouse.
That plan identified 15 pastures to be closed to grazing for
research with a two-year notice. Two have been vacated, and it calls for
39 miles of fencing. ARPMA was developed during the Obama
administration then dropped from a revised version enacted by the
Trump administration. However, a federal court reinstated it in 2019,
which the environmental groups are pursuing.
U.S. District Judge Michael Simon released an
opinion and order on March
29 saying the environmental plaintiffs haven’t shown that turning cattle
out on the pastures will cause irreparable harm to sage grouse or to
rangeland research.
ONDA and Attorney Lacy didn’t stop at the 13
pastures in the conservation plan.
Judge Simon’s opinion states,
“Moreover, closure of the four pastures containing RNAs set for grazing
in April would enjoin grazing on significant portions of land not
designated as an RNA by the 2015 ARMPA. Because fencing has not yet
been installed, Plaintiffs propose that the Court order Defendants to
close the entire pastures that contain the key RNAs. The total acreage
of the key RNAs 21,779 acres. The total acreage of the pastures
containing the RNAs is 197,867 acres. Thus, Plaintiffs ask the Court to
close 176,088 acres of pasture not designated as key RNAs under the
2015 ARMPA.â€
Ranchers are asking, what is more detrimental to the sage grouse, co-
habitat with cattle or fences?
The BLM attorney argued that it must
follow bureaucratic processes before halting grazing and building the
necessary fences to keep cattle out. Fences aren’t an environmentally
friendly way to close pastures and it impacts wildlife and plant species
so BLM is studying alternative methods. BLM has not identified any
data that would be lost or not collected if the closures don’t happen on
schedule. So why is ONDA so impatient?
US Agricultural Research Service rangeland scientists David Ganskopp
(now retired) and Chad Boyd studied cattle grazing patterns on
sagebrush communities. They found that cattle first preferred to graze
on perennial grass growing between sagebrush plants where the sage-
grouse nest and feed. They concluded that ranchers could preserve
grouse habitat by monitoring grass available.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
The livestock industry is the best suited for eastern Oregon’s rough land
and weather conditions. It’s where most of Oregon’s cattle are raised
with and estimated production value of $493 million, ranked as
Oregon’s second highest agricultural commodity. Ranchers have united
to form Oregon Country Beef cooperative to emphasize stewardship of
the land that enables them to brand their beef as a specialized
“natural†commodity. Limiting pasture land will have consequences.
Why did Lacy and ONDA file the injunction when they knew they were
exceeding the ARMPA?
This is a tactic in search of a liberal judge, and
they weren’t counting on Judge Simon calling them out. Inflation could
be worse if our food supply is threatened. Judicial races do make a
difference.
--Donna BleilerPost Date: 2022-04-03 10:15:55 | Last Update: 2022-04-03 14:52:18 |