16 Democrats voted no
Oregon Senate Republicans voted to advance a measure that would
modernize Oregon’s curriculum transparency laws.
SB 1575 would
require district school boards to post course titles, textbooks,
instructional materials, syllabus and applicable state academic content
standards on the school district's website.
School board meetings all over the state are seeing an increase in
parent participation over critical race theory (CRT) and sexual identity
course content. Parents feel they have been blindsided by content of
what their children are being taught in school.
The law allows the district school board to establish supplemental
courses that are not inconsistent with the prescribed courses. They may
adopt courses of study in lieu of state courses of study upon approval
by the Superintendent of Public Instruction. SB 1575 would make the
information available but it doesn't ensure prior notice be given
parents before adoption.
ORS 336.465 outlines the rights of parents to examine “instructional
materials to be used in any class, course, assembly or school-sponsored
activity.†Despite this promise of transparency, parents often have no
practical way of exercising this right.
Outdated procedures often
require parents to travel to district facilities or school buildings during
limited hours (typically during working hours). This is a barrier for many
parents.
“It’s time to bring Oregon’s value of transparency into the 21st
century,†said Senator Kim Thatcher (R-Keizer), author of the bill.
“Current law already gives parents the right to see what materials are being used to teach their kids. For decades, we have recognized
parents’ right to know. This bill would create a streamlined process for
parents to exercise that right.â€
Thatcher continued, “The internet gives parents and students access to
near unlimited information at their fingertips. Students use computers
to complete assignments and even to participate in the classroom. Our
transparency laws need to be updated.â€
According to a recent national survey, 85% of voters agree that parents
should be allowed to see all curriculum, books, and other materials in
classes their children are taking. Seventy-one percent believe parents
should have a ‘significant’ role in their children’s’ curriculum
development process.
The motion to withdraw from committee on Education to debate SB
1575 on the Senate floor failed along party lines, 9-16, with all
Democrats voting no. The bill will remain dead in the Senate Education
Committee.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
Senators that voted against supporting parents’ right to have access
and review curriculum materials are: Rachel Armitage (D-Scappoose), Peter Courtney (D-Salem),
Michael Dembrow (D-Portland), Lew Frederick (D-Portland), Sara Gelser Blouin (D-Corvallis), Jeff Golden (D-Ashland), Chris
Gorsek (D-Portland), Kayse Jama (D-Portland), Kate Lieber (D-Beaverton), James Manning Jr (D-Eugene), Deb Patterson (D-Salem),
Floyd Prozanski (D-Eugene), Janeen Sollman (D-Hillsboro), Elizabeth Steiner Hayward (D-Portland), Kathleen
Taylor (D-Portland), and Rob Wagner (D-Lake Oswego).
These same Senators voted for SB 1521 reducing the value of parents’
voices at school board meetings giving the school district
superintendent unfettered power over the school board.
--Donna BleilerPost Date: 2022-03-05 06:47:36 | Last Update: 2022-03-04 14:03:35 |