On this day, November 21, 1992, Oregon Senator Bob Packwood, issued an apology but refused to discuss allegations that he'd made unwelcome sexual advances toward 10 women over the years.
Public input sought on how to spend recovery funding
Oregon Housing and Community Services is looking for public input on what the priorities should be for spending $422 million in disaster recovery funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
The funds will come in the form of a Community Development Block Grant for disaster recovery and mitigation and will assist with the ongoing recovery from the 2020 Labor Day fires.
In order to receive the funding later this year, the agency must complete a series of federal requirements, including developing an Action Plan to lay out how the money will be spent.
The Action Plan will focus on replacing housing, particularly for low- and moderate-income families or individuals, but there are also other ways the money can be spent, such as on public infrastructure or economic revitalization.
OHCS has been meeting with local governments and community groups working on wildfire recovery to get their input on priorities for the Action Plan, but the Oregon Housing and Community Services department says they also want to hear from interested members of the public.
OHCS invites anyone who is interested to take its online survey, including a mobile-friendly version, which is available on the
OHCS website.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
“We are looking for public input, because it’s the right thing to do. It’s the ‘Oregon Way,’ and we know it will make the plan better,†said Alex Campbell, chief external affairs officer for Recovery and Resiliency at OHCS. “We are especially interested to hear from folks we know were hit the hardest and who face the greatest challenges in recovery, including our Latino/a/x neighbors, older residents, and Oregonians who have specific housing needs due to disability or other circumstance.â€
Once a draft Action Plan is written, Oregonians will have another opportunity to provide comment in May, as required by HUD.
More details on how to participate will be announced in the coming weeks.
--Bruce ArmstrongPost Date: 2022-03-23 20:09:52 | Last Update: 2022-03-23 20:28:42 |
Conservatives Rally to Support Lindsay Berchauer
TYamhill County will not get a new Commissioner -- at least for now. As of 8 am. on March 23rd with 100% of precincts reporting in the Recall election of Commissioner Lindsay Berschauer, the no vote count was 1,580 ahead. A total of 33,000 votes were cast representing 44.3% of registered voters.
The Recall attempt initiated by Progressive Yamhill, a local part of Indivisible, was
well funded. Indivisible money came in from national public unions, Soros globalists, and Hollywood. It funded several mailers and studio production videos that aired on TV in prime time.
A conservative coalition of
family farms,
Yamhill Republicans, Newberg/Dundee and McMinnville Strong put boots on the ground to work in opposition of the Recall. Groups led by Julia Howard and Beth Keyser canvassed every house on their list, a Herculean task accomplished. Matt Jordan directed volunteers who made near 6000 phone calls to neighbors.
Isaac and Rose Etherington wrote and produced home videos which aired on social media. Mailers were produced and funded by
Oregon Family Farms and others from rural communities. James Goings led an effort that covered the county with field signs. Steve Howard scheduled crews of elections observers for signature verification and ballot counting.
Legacy Oregon media -- Oregon Public Broadcasting -- jumped in with
questionable headlines like "Yamhill County chair likely survives recall amid accusations of spurring divisive politics." One local insider quipped that this kind of coverage "spurs divisive politics."
The recall election cost County taxpayers near $100,000. An earlier failed Recall attempt involving Newberg School Board members cost the County near $60,000.
The political opponents will get little rest. The next election is May 17th, less than two months from now. That election will determine the other two positions on the Board of Commissioners. Campaigns for those and other elected offices are already well underway.
--Tom HammerPost Date: 2022-03-23 09:47:25 | Last Update: 2022-03-23 17:09:46 |
ODA prepares as highly pathogenic avian influenza is confirmed
On March 2, the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) confirmed a bald eagle found dead in British Columbia, Canada tested positive for the
highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) Eurasian strain H5N1.
The detection is the
first in North America’s Pacific Flyway, since 2015.
HPAI is a highly contagious, deadly disease in domestic poultry. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, HPAI detections do not present an immediate public health concern.
No human cases of these avian influenza viruses have been detected in the United States.
“The best protection for birds are owners who practice effective biosecurity,†said Dr. Ryan Scholz, State Veterinarian, Oregon Department of Agriculture. “We must be vigilant and strict with our biosecurity practices especially for backyard flocks, as well as educated on when and how to report potential avian influenza deaths. Our preparation could reduce the risk of infection among poultry and prevent or limit the impact of HPAI introduction in Oregon.â€
Earlier this year, the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) confirmed HPAI in wild waterfowl in the Atlantic Flyway, on the east coast.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
In addition, USDA APHIS has also confirmed HPAI infections in 16 states including both backyard and commercial flocks with new detections announced every week.
ODA is working closely with USDA APHIS, other federal partners, neighboring states, and commercial poultry producers to prevent the introduction of HPAI into Oregon’s poultry flocks.
ODA is asking for the public’s help in detecting HPAI in backyard flocks.
Tracking cases is critical. ODA asks bird owners to report unusual increases in illness or death rates in their flocks. If you find a sick or dead bird, don’t touch it, report it.
--Bruce ArmstrongPost Date: 2022-03-22 17:36:55 | Last Update: 2022-03-22 17:56:44 |
Implementing a toll on Interstate 205
Regional leaders and elected representatives from local jurisdictions worked together to ensure income from this measure will benefit local communities.
A plan by the Oregon Department of Transportation to implement a toll on Interstate 205 to pay for improvements in Clackamas County received a key procedural approval Thursday after the Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation voted to amend two regional transportation plans.
JPACT's vote was to amend both the Regional Transportation Plan and the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program, two federally-mandated documents that needed a formal amendment for the tolling project to proceed.
The yes vote now sends the proposal to the Metro Council, which must also approve the plan for it to proceed.
Two Metro councilors serving on JPACT, Christine Lewis and Juan Carlos Gonzalez, voted against the tolling proposal. The vote came after an intense discussion among JPACT members about a number of topics, including equity, trust and how the I-205 tolling plan fits into the broader picture of plans for a regional congestion pricing program.
The Metro councilors were joined by JPACT members from Clackamas County and Portland, who also voted against the proposal and expressed concerns about traffic diversion and a lack of transparency in ODOT's decision-making process.
ODOT officials said the plan is an important step in paying for long-promised improvements to I-205 in Clackamas County, including a seismic retrofit of the Abernethy Bridge over the Willamette River in Oregon City and a congestion relief effort between that bridge and Stafford Road. However, Clackamas County leaders have been concerned about whether the tolls, which are proposed as a way to pay for the bridge improvements and widening plan, would cause drivers to divert off the freeway and onto local roads, like Highway 99E through Canby and Oregon City, or Willamette Falls Drive through West Linn.
Lewis, whose Metro Council district includes most of urban Clackamas County, lives in West Linn's Willamette neighborhood, where drivers already use Willamette Falls Drive to avoid the congestion on I-205. She said ODOT had made improvements to the plan to address diversion and equity – but not enough to earn her vote.
"Regional partnership was very strong on this, and everyone came together to improve this proposal," she said. "The overall package is better because it now includes language that forces ODOT to spend money on local streets to which traffic from I-205 is already diverting. They will also be required to invest in local communities, make sure the project is in sync with other congestion pricing efforts, and they must now commit to prioritizing safety and equity."
But, she said, she's still concerned about how the tolling proposal for I-205 will fit into efforts to create a regional congestion pricing plan.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
"It makes no sense to place undue burden on communities in Clackamas without syncing the timeline up to the regional system we are trying to build," Lewis said.
Clackamas County Commissioner Paul Savas expressed concerns over including language that opens the door to tolling on all lanes of the interstate.
"I'm inclined to think that we will put more people at risk," he said. "I don't think we will accomplish, and perhaps even worsen our climate goals, and frankly I think there are some serious economic impacts that have not been considered."
Joining the coalition against the proposal was Jo Ann Hardesty, the Portland City Commissioner responsible for that city's Bureau of Transportation. She said the past month "has been wonderful communication with ODOT," but expressed concerns about ODOT's record when it comes to listening and working closely with local communities.
"I still see a reluctance to do anything different that you've ever done," she said. "I push back on the notion that we should trust you, because there is nothing in your history that proves that we should trust ODOT to actually do the right thing when it comes to prioritizing other modes of transportation, when it comes to being a real partner in our communities. I'm not clear that ODOT has listened at all about the major concerns in Clackamas or the major concerns that folks in my community have about how much it's going to cost them to actually travel in a city where they've been pushed out to the edges."
But ODOT officials said the plan had made significant changes to address concerns about diversion mitigation and the impacts of the plan on local communities. The plan to move forward includes commitments from ODOT to elevate the role of local policymakers and stakeholders, center equity and process in outcomes, increase transit and multimodal transportation options, and provide fiscal transparency to build trust and understanding.
That was enough to get support of Milwaukie City Councilor Kathy Hyzy, who had previously been opposed to the plan.
"So much of this is stepping out on faith and deciding where to take risks," she said. "At this point I think we're just going to have to step out in faith that ODOT is going to do its best. We are relying on ODOT to do what it is saying at these tables; that is going to be critical, and we will be watching. And in future votes we will be paying close attention to see that ODOT has done not just its level best, but has pulled out all the stops to get these two things as closely aligned as is extra-humanly possible because the cities and the region do not want to be left hanging when it comes to tolling."
--Staff ReportsPost Date: 2022-03-21 09:30:42 | Last Update: 2022-03-21 09:46:11 |
The frontier for the rights of the unborn
As the repeal of Roe v. Wade heats up in the U.S. Supreme Court,
Oregon’s majority party pushed through
HB 4034 to make the Reproductive Healthcare Equity Act permanent.
Buried within HB 4034, which adds to what a pharmacy intern can do,
allowing a pharmacy to swipe person's driver license for purchasing
pseudoephedrine without a prescription to a person who is at least 18
years of age with a valid government-issued photo identification, is the
implementation of the Reproductive Health Equity Act of 2017 (RHEA).
Usually, laws that compel health insurance providers to cover particular
treatments are automatically repealed after six years. HB 4034 didn’t
need to add RHEA because it already made abortions a free medical
benefit. Not only did HB 4034 make abortion benefits permanent, but
the slap in the face came by adding an “emergency clause†preventing a
citizen’s petition from challenging the law by a vote.
HB 4034 also allotted distribution of $2,555,000 General Fund to give
Oregon Health Authority more latitude in who receives grants to push
their pro-abortion agenda, including schools.
The bill authorizes ten
school districts to receive grants for health care centers, and awards up
to four grants to school districts or education service districts for
mobile school-linked health centers.
Putting health care centers in schools is another way to separate
children from parents allowing state to provide treatments without
parents' knowledge.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
Abortion first showed up in Oregon law In 2017,
HB 3391, in a full court
press by Democrats to pass the Reproductive Health Equity Act (RHEA).
The Act expanded health coverage to access free reproductive health
services, including abortion, contraceptive options, and experimental or
investigational treatments or treatment that do not conform to
acceptable and customary standards of medical practices.
Why the urgency to make the RHEA law permanent?
If the Supreme
Court overturns Roe v. Wade, the decision goes back to individual
states.
There are 26 states likely to ban abortions. However, 15 states
are taking action to make abortion a legal right by passing laws.
Republicans put forth a motion to withdraw pro-life bills from
committees in 2021 in both Houses with
HB 2699 and
SB 586 that would
require an aborted baby born alive to be treated as a viable person.
Democrats voted down both attempts.
HB 4034 is currently awaiting the governor’s signature.
--Donna BleilerPost Date: 2022-03-20 12:41:46 | Last Update: 2022-03-20 15:56:53 |
Andrew Shearer has been appointed
After serving the Springfield community for nearly a year as Interim Chief, Springfield City Manager Nancy Newton
has appointed Andrew Shearer to serve as Springfield’s next Police Chief.
He will be officially sworn in at 10:30 a.m. Monday, March 28th.
Shearer brings more than 29 years of law enforcement experience to Springfield, most recently as Assistant Chief of Police with the City of Portland.
When selected to serve as interim, Chief Shearer issued his commitment to working alongside community members, public safety stakeholders and SPD to enhance community trust, improve transparency, and to foster a policing culture based on dignity, fairness, respect, and accountability.
“Ten months ago, I was provided an opportunity to serve the members of SPD and this community. Since then, I’ve witnessed the courage of the men and women of this agency firsthand,†Springfield Police Chief Andrew Shearer said.
He continued, “We should all appreciate their selflessness in the face of danger in order to protect the people of Springfield as well as their courageousness in self-reflection to seek continual improvement. A safe city requires trust and partnership between police and community in addition to a combined commitment to public safety for all. That commitment is strong here in Springfield. I am confident that existing partnerships will strengthen, new ones will grow, and we can achieve even greater successes in this city."
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
Newton said Chief Shearer not only brought the experience and fresh perspective the City was hoping for in a new Chief, his leadership led the department to make considerable strides to improve the work of law enforcement such as increasing access to information, updating policies and procedures, improving opportunities for the community to engage with the department, providing more officer training, and working to strengthen relationships with underserved communities.
“Chief Shearer’s approach to the responsibilities of Police Chief have been exemplary,†Newton said. “We are very fortunate to have someone with his extensive experience, thoughtful guidance, and compassion serving our community. He embodies the balance we need to ensure we conduct our work based on best practices and accountability, provide proper training and support for SPD; and serve all community members with respect, fairness, and dignity. His steady guidance and exceptional leadership came at the right time, and I am very pleased he is continuing with us in service to the Springfield community.â€
--Bruce ArmstrongPost Date: 2022-03-19 18:10:51 | Last Update: 2022-03-19 19:15:44 |
Making DST permanent
Oregon passed a law in 2019 to make Daylight Saving Time (DST)
permanent if Washington and California also approved the change, and
Federal law allowed the change. Federal law does not currently allow
full-time DST.
In the last four years, 18 states have enacted legislation or passed
resolutions to provide for year-round daylight saving time, including
Washington and California.
None of that matters if Congress doesn’t act.
On Tuesday, the U.S.
Senate took a surprise unanimous vote to make DST permanent by
passing the Sunshine Protection Act of 2021.
The federal proposal
would supersede any state laws. If it passes, all of Oregon, including
Malheur County, would be permanently on daylight time. The Oregon
State law alone excludes Malheur County, the only Oregon county that
observes Mountain Time.
Daylight saving time has long been a topic of discussion in Congress on
the potential benefits and the costs of daylight saving time since it was
first adopted as a wartime measure in 1942.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
The proposal will now go
to the House, where the Energy and Commerce Committee had a
hearing to discuss possible legislation last week. The chair,
Representative Frank Pallone Jr., agreed it was time to quit changing
clocks, but was uncertain whether it should be daylight savings time or
standard time.
Perhaps the U.S. Senate made that decision for him.
--Donna BleilerPost Date: 2022-03-19 17:12:19 | Last Update: 2022-03-20 19:59:31 |
As required, Oregon OSHA will initiate rulemaking
Oregon OSHA has determined that the following changes to its COVID-19 Requirements for All Workplaces as describe in the Oregon Administrative rules
OAR 437-001-0744. As required, Oregon OSHA will initiate rulemaking to achieve these modifications. Until that rulemaking is complete, Oregon OSHA will modify its enforcement activities so that it does not enforce any provisions of the rule, other than the requirements that are outlined below.
In a
Workplace Advisory Memo issued last week, OSHA has determined that employers in general workplaces, which are defined as all workplaces other than exceptional risk workplaces, must:
1) Allow workers to voluntarily use facial coverings and provide facial coverings at no cost to workers.
2) Facilitate COVID-19 testing for workers if such testing is conducted at the employer’s direction by ensuring the employer covers the costs associated with that testing, including employee time and travel.
In addition to those requirements, employers in general workplaces should:
1) Continue to optimize the use of ventilation systems to help reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission.
2) Follow OHA, public health, or medical provider recommendations for isolation or quarantine of employees for COVID-19.
3) Provide notice to workers who have had a potential work-related exposure to COVID-19 within 24 hours.
--Staff ReportsPost Date: 2022-03-19 16:46:35 | Last Update: 2022-03-19 17:14:21 |
If you received an Oregon Earned Income Tax Credit, no action is required
The Oregon Legislature recently passed
HB 4157 which will provide a one-time $600 payment to Oregon households who received an Earned Income Tax Credit on their 2020 tax filing. The one-time payment will be sent by July 31, 2022.
If you filed a 2020 Oregon tax return by December 31, 2021 and received an Oregon Earned Income Tax Credit, no action is required on your part, and you will automatically receive your payment by direct deposit or check. The payments are not taxable for Oregon and will not be applied to state and federal debt owed by eligible households.
Taxpayers that were eligible for EITC in 2020 but did not claim it on their return can amend their 2020 federal and Oregon returns by April 15, 2022 to claim the EITC and still be eligible for the one-time assistance payment. Taxpayers who miss this deadline, and did not receive an Oregon EITC, will not receive a payment.
More information on the one-time assistance payments and amended returns is available on the
One Time Assistance Payment webpage.
--Staff ReportsPost Date: 2022-03-18 16:41:09 | Last Update: 2022-03-18 16:48:13 |
Senate Republicans seek to preserve tax relief
Secretary of State Shemia Fagan has released an
audit of Oregon’s mortgage interest deduction. The document blames the deduction, that allows Oregonians to keep more of their own money, for many of Oregon’s housing woes.
“This ‘audit’ reads more like a
political messaging memo than any real research,†said Deputy Senate Republican Leader Chuck Thomsen (R-Hood River). “The Secretary is politicizing the Audits Division for her own partisan ends of shifting blame away from her party’s decades of housing policy failures onto a tool that hundreds of thousands of working-class families use to make ends meet.â€
“Democrats continue to double down on failed housing policies that drive up the cost of housing while trying to run away from
responsibility,†said Senate Republican Leader Tim Knopp (R-Bend). “In the middle of all this economic uncertainty, it's unclear why
the Secretary is attacking the one tax benefit that is available to working-class Oregonians.
“If Democrats want to eliminate the mortgage interest deduction, they will be voting to raise taxes on hundreds of thousands of Oregonians across the state. Increasing taxes on Oregonians won’t make housing more affordable. Republicans will fight any effort to curb this vital tax relief.â€
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
Democrats have consistently opposed Republican-led efforts to make structural reforms to decrease the cost of housing. Last session, Democrats blocked a Republican effort to make the impact of housing regulation on the cost of housing more transparent by voting down
SB 1537. Democrats also blocked
HB 4118 which would have cleared roadblocks to the development of workforce housing.
--Staff ReportsPost Date: 2022-03-17 13:57:50 | Last Update: 2022-03-17 13:50:15 |
Using public office to promote socialism?
In an
audit that insiders decried as political, Oregon Secretary of State Shemia Fagan (D-Portland) said that the "home mortgage interest deduction as a deeply inequitable and regressive tax policy." One former legislator described her comment on her audit as "using public office to promote socialism." The mortgage interest deduction allows some, but not all, homeowners to reduce their taxable income by the amount of interest paid on mortgages up to $750,000.
Fagan continued, "While houselessness and the lack of affordable housing impact communities all over the state, auditors found the state’s largest housing subsidy mostly benefits wealthy and white Oregonians in urban counties. Fagan, herself, is a white Oregonian from an urban county. Additionally, the mortgage interest deduction receives no state-level evaluation as to whether it is meeting its purpose, limiting accountability for its inequitable outcomes."
“The affordable housing crisis is squeezing families across Oregon while the state’s largest spending on housing primarily flows to wealthy homeowners in the metro area. That is indefensible,†said Secretary of State Shemia Fagan. “Every dollar spent keeping seniors and working families in their homes or helping renters stay housed has been scrutinized and debated by lawmakers. Meanwhile billions of dollars just walk out the backdoor with no questions asked. I can’t think of a worse example of waste and systemic inequality than that.â€
The mortgage interest deduction has been law in Oregon since 1923. This biennium alone, the deduction is expected to save taxpayers over $1.1 billion. Auditors analyzed the benefits of the mortgage interest deduction by income, geography, and race and found a disproportionate share of the benefits flow to the wealthiest taxpayers.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
Despite record revenue growth in state tax revenue in recent years, auditors recommend the Legislature identify a clear purpose for the mortgage interest deduction in statute and determine if changes are necessary to ensure the purpose is met. Auditors also recommend the Legislature identify a state agency to be responsible for regularly evaluating the policy.
While the Department of Revenue is responsible for administering Oregon tax law, changing this policy would require legislative action.
--Staff ReportsPost Date: 2022-03-16 19:46:07 | Last Update: 2022-03-16 19:57:50 |
It’s not the King of Rock. It’s the Electronic Valuation Information System
Editor's note: This is the fifth of a multipart series on HB 5202, the budget bill for the 2022 Legislative Session.
A somewhat confusing part of the budget is the Article XI-Q bond program, which was passed by voters in 2010. It is used to acquire, construct, remodel, repair, equip or furnish real or personal property that is owned or operated by the State of Oregon. In order to keep the State’s cost of financing as low as possible, the bonds are primarily issued on a taxâ€exempt basis under the IRS federal tax code saving interest cost over the prior method of Certificate of Participation. Upon project completion, the unspent proceeds remaining are usually used to pay debt service or to be transferred to a different legislatively approved project.
ORS 286A.824 allows an agency to request financing for real or personal property projects that may be financed with Article XI-Q bond proceeds. Bond funds are not included in the agency’s budget, but in separate policy packages. But they need authorization to obligate taxpayers for the indebtedness through legislative budget bills.
SB 5701 increases bond authorizations for the 2021-23 biennium approving $156.07 million. This measure increases the general Fund support debt by $54.06 million in Article XI-Q general obligation bond authority reflected in
HB 5202.
Within that authority is a decrease of $435,000 to the Department of Revenue that resulted from previously approved Article XI-Q bonds for the Electronic Valuation Information System (ELVIS). This reduction to cover the taxable portion of the project frees up $400,000 from project costs and $35,000 from costs of issuing bonds. This project total is $3,810,000 Article XI-Q bond authority remains for the 2021-23 biennium.
The Oregon Judicial Department requested an increase for the Crook County Courthouse. Approved were an additional $4,445,000 Article XI-Q bonds to finance $4,416,705 of project costs and $28,295 for costs of issuing the bonds. The authorization results in total 2021-23 Article XI-Q bond authority of $16,330,000 for the construction of a new facility to replace the Crook County Courthouse.
State Capitol Accessibility, Maintenance, and Safety Phase III, approved $19,865,000 Article XI-Q bonds to finance $19,630,000 of project costs and $235,000 for costs of issuing the bonds. The project is for capital improvements to the State Capitol Building, including upgrades to the 1938 building for improved functionality, fire protection systems, seismic retrofits, roof repairs, security upgrades, IT and media modernization, and upgrades to remaining mechanical, electrical, and plumbing equipment not addressed in Phases I and II.
New amounts are also directed to public universities in the amount of $30 million for Higher Education Coordinating Commission grants. Approved was $5.1 million to Oregon Department of Emergency Management, Resiliency Grant Fund. Lottery Bond authorization for 2021-23 are also increased in SB 5701 by $23.07 million to support three projects.
Details for bonds can be found in
SB 5701 Measure Summary. Bonds are often dismissed because it isn’t a direct draw from the General Fund. But it is like charging a credit card and sooner or later the debt has to be paid by taxpayers.
--Donna BleilerPost Date: 2022-03-16 06:46:10 | Last Update: 2022-03-14 11:09:50 |
Read More Articles