Post an Event
Multnomah County Fair |
Saturday, May 25, 2024 at 9:00 am |
Multnomah County Fair |
Oaks Amusement Park |
Memorial Day |
Monday, May 27, 2024 at 11:00 am |
Memorial Day
|
A federal holiday in the United States for honoring and mourning the U.S. military personnel who died while serving. |
Juneteenth |
Wednesday, June 19, 2024 at 12:00 am |
Juneteenth |
Celebrated on the anniversary of June 19, 1865, when in the wake of the American Civil War, Major General Gordon Granger ordered the final enforcement of the Emancipation Proclamation in Texas. |
Jackson County Fair |
Tuesday, July 16, 2024 at 8:00 am |
TheExpo.com July 16-21 |
Jackson County Fairgrounds - The Expo |
Washington County Fair |
Friday, July 19, 2024 at 8:00 am |
https://www.bigfairfun.com/ July 19-28 |
Washington County Fairgrounds - Westside Commons |
Jefferson County Fair |
Wednesday, July 24, 2024 at 8:00 am |
www.jcfair.fun July 24-27 |
Jefferson County Fair Complex |
Lane County Fair |
Wednesday, July 24, 2024 at 8:00 am |
www.atthefair.com July 24-28 |
Lane Events Center |
Malheur County Fair |
Tuesday, July 30, 2024 at 8:00 am |
www.malheurcountyfair.com July 30 - August 3 |
Malheur County Fairgrounds - Desert Sage Event Center |
Benton County Fair & Rodeo |
Wednesday, July 31, 2024 at 8:00 am |
bceventcentercorvallis.net July 31 - August 3, 2024 |
Benton County Event Center & Fairgrounds |
Deschutes County Fair |
Wednesday, July 31, 2024 at 8:00 am |
https://expo.deschutes.org/ July 31 - August 4 |
Deschutes County Fair & Expo Center |
Union County Fair |
Wednesday, July 31, 2024 at 8:00 am |
www.unioncountyfair.org July 31 - August 3 |
Union County Fairgrounds |
Baker County Fair |
Sunday, August 4, 2024 at 8:00 am |
www.bakerfair.com August 4-9 |
Baker County Fairgrounds |
Tillamook County Fair |
Wednesday, August 7, 2024 at 8:00 am |
www.tillamookfair.com August 7-10 |
Tillamook County Fairgrounds |
Clackamas County Fair |
Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 8:00 am |
clackamascountyfair.com August 13-17 |
Clackamas County Event Center |
Oregon State Fair |
Saturday, August 31, 2024 at 8:00 am |
www.oregonstateexpo.org August 31 - September 9 |
Oregon State Fair & Exposition Center |
View All Calendar Events
Decriminalizing drugs in Oregon
Editor's note: This is part four of a multi-part series covering the 2020 Oregon General Election ballot measures.
Issues of public safety, law enforcement and police procedure have become big issues lately. Police shootings and subsequent riots have driven these issues the to forefront, and
Ballot Measure 110 is just one battle in this war.
This measure decriminalizes many drug offenses and diverts marijuana tax money to treatment programs. Unlike
Measure 90 in 2016, Measure 110 doesn't provide any legal or tax structure for the drugs it decriminalizes.
While the measure purports to reduce the number of drug-related incarcerations, in 2019 the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission published a
report on the success of
House Bill 2355, showing a marked reduction in misdemeanor drug possession convictions and racial disparity in arrests. Fewer convictions is the result of the new law diverting offenders. The argument for reducing drug-related incarcerations is becoming weaker and weaker.
Opponents of this issue also point out that far from being unkind,
consequences of drug use are needed to help addicts to seek help.
This initiative has been almost completely funded by a national organization
Drug Policy Action which is the advocacy and political arm of the
Drug Policy Alliance. This organization shows concern for overdoses and incarceration, though it can be seen as a part of the wider anti-law enforcement movement nationally. They pumped in about $2 million dollars of out-of-state money to put this initiative on the ballot. About $80,000 was left and that was turned over to
More Treatment for a Better Oregon: Yes on 110 committee. Over half of that was spent on voters pamphlet statements.
On their website, they describe themselves as "A nonpartisan,
not-for-profit organization, Drug Policy Action undertakes a wide range of activities including political advocacy permitted by 501(c)(4) organizations." They say that they "work to pass new drug laws and policies grounded in science, compassion, health and human rights -- and to elect candidates at every level who support these principles."
Interestingly, $1,000 was donated by disgraced former Multnomah County Commission Chair Jeff Cogen out of his campaign account. Readers might remember that Cogen was driven from office in a
scandal that included his alleged use of illegal drugs.
This is the official title for the measure, as provided by the Attorney General, as it will appear on the ballot:
Provides statewide addiction/recovery services; marijuana taxes partially finance;
reclassifies possession/penalties for specified drugs
Result of “Yes†Vote: “Yes†vote provides addiction recovery centers/services; marijuana taxes partially finance (reduces revenues for other purposes); reclassifies possession of specified drugs, reduces penalties; requires audits.
Result of “No†Vote: “No†vote rejects requiring addiction recovery centers/services; retains current marijuana tax revenue uses; maintains current classifications/penalties for possession of drugs
Summary: Measure mandates establishment/ funding of “addiction recovery centers†(centers) within each existing coordinated care organization service area by October 1, 2021; centers provide drug users with triage, health assessments, treatment, recovery services. To fund centers, measure dedicates all marijuana tax revenue above $11,250,000 quarterly, legislative appropriations, and any savings from reductions in arrests, incarceration, supervision resulting from the measure. Reduces marijuana tax
revenue for other uses. Measure reclassifies personal non-commercial possession of certain drugs under specified amount from misdemeanor or felony (depending on person’s criminal history) to Class E violation subject to either $100 fine or a completed
health assessment by center. Oregon Health Authority establishes council to distribute funds/ oversee implementation of centers. Secretary of State audits biennially. Other provisions.
Major donations to More Treatment for a Better Oregon: Yes on 110 |
Date | Donor | Amount |
09/01/2020 | Nurses United Political Action Committee (12987) | $5,000 |
08/13/2020 | Drug Policy Action | $70,000 |
08/10/2020 | Oregon AFSCME Council 75 | $10,000 |
08/03/2020 | Bridges to Change, Inc. | $5,000 |
08/02/2020 | Ben Wood | $1,000 |
07/29/2020 | Friends of Jeff Cogen (5571) | $1,000 |
07/19/2020 | Miscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under | $2,175 |
07/12/2020 | Charles Swindells | $1,000 |
07/12/2020 | Kenneth Thrasher | $1,000 |
07/12/2020 | Robert Quillin | $1,000 |
07/12/2020 | Robert Quillin | $4,000 |
07/09/2020 | Drug Policy Action | $200,000 |
06/21/2020 | Thomas Imeson | $1,000 |
06/21/2020 | Susan Mandiberg | $1,000 |
06/21/2020 | Richard Harris | $1,000 |
06/08/2020 | Drug Policy Action | $225,000 |
05/13/2020 | Drug Policy Action | $250,000 |
03/26/2020 | Drug Policy Action | $300,000 |
02/27/2020 | Drug Policy Action | $300,000 |
02/23/2020 | David Menschel | $1,000 |
02/06/2020 | Drug Policy Action | $300,000 |
01/10/2020 | Drug Policy Action | $215,000 |
12/09/2019 | Drug Policy Action | $215,000 |
--Ben FisherPost Date: 2020-10-09 11:42:14 | Last Update: 2020-10-02 16:01:23 |
Legalizing Medical Mushrooms
Editor's note: This is part three of a multi-part series covering the 2020 Oregon General Election ballot measures.
After spending the eye-popping sum of nearly $1.5 million dollars to place this measure on the ballot
New Approach PAC will present Measure 109 to the voters. That's over $13 per required signature and one almost can't help but wonder if so much has to be spent per signature, maybe it's not going to be all that popular.
New Approach PAC is a Washington, DC based, super-PAC that has it's sights set on drug legalization on a state-by-state basis. In the wake of Measure 90 in 2014, it's almost as if national drug-legalization efforts have their sights set on Oregon as a semi-willing victim. The basic proposal is to legalize psilocybic mushrooms for medical use. Research has shown that they may have some efficacy for treating PTSD, drug abuse and other disorders.
Despite the dubious record of the cumbersome process for drug approval under the onerous shadow of "big pharma," one wonders if the initiative process is any better of a way to approve medicine. The lesson here might be that if you establish too excessive of a regulatory bureaucracy, one way or the other, we the people will prevail and get our way.
Oregon is proud of the fact that it is the first in many policy areas. Voters may not wish to make Oregon the first state to legalize "magic mushrooms." Other drugs have testing, known potency, accepted dosages and we already have dispensaries called drugstores. Voter approved pharmaceuticals bypass some of the structures we have to reduce problems.
This is the official title for the measure, as provided by the Attorney General, as it will appear on the ballot:
Allows manufacture, delivery, administration of psilocybin at supervised, licensed
facilities;
imposes two-year development period
Result of “Yes†Vote: Allows manufacture, delivery, administration of psilocybin (psychoactive mushroom) at supervised,
licensed facilities; imposes two-year development period. Creates enforcement/taxation system, advisory board, administration fund.
Result of “No†Vote: “No†vote retains current law, which prohibits manufacture, delivery, and possession of psilocybin and imposes misdemeanor or felony criminal penalties.
Summary: Currently, federal and state laws prohibit the manufacture, delivery, and possession of psilocybin (psychoactive mushroom). Initiative amends state law to require Oregon Health Authority (OHA) to establish Oregon Psilocybin Services Program to allow licensed/regulated production, processing, delivery, possession of psilocybin exclusively for administration of “psilocybin services†(defined) by licensed “facilitator†(defined) to “qualified client†(defined). Grants OHA authority to
implement, administer, and enforce program. Imposes two-year development period before implementation of program. Establishes fund for program administration and governor-appointed advisory board that must initially include one measure sponsor; members are compensated. Imposes packaging, labeling, and dosage requirements. Requires sales tax for retail psilocybin. Preempts local laws inconsistent with program except “reasonable regulations†(defined). Exempts licensed/regulated activities from
criminal penalties. Other provisions.
Major donations to PSI 2020 |
Date | Donor | Amount |
09/04/2020 | Yes for Psilocybin Therapy (20657) | $45,000 |
07/17/2020 | Adam Wiggins | $20,000 |
07/15/2020 | Adam Wiggins | $25,000 |
07/09/2020 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $40,000 |
06/30/2020 | David Menschel | $1,000 |
06/19/2020 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $80,000 |
06/15/2020 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $65,000 |
06/09/2020 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $40,000 |
06/03/2020 | John Gilmore | $9,981 |
05/22/2020 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $80,000 |
05/11/2020 | Sasha Cajkovich | $10,000 |
05/10/2020 | Ron Beller | $9,952 |
05/10/2020 | Mark Farr | $1,738 |
04/19/2020 | Robert Faust | $1,000 |
04/19/2020 | Jeffrey Zucker | $2,500 |
04/15/2020 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $60,000 |
04/12/2020 | Megan Frost | $1,000 |
04/12/2020 | Timothy Kutscha | $2,000 |
03/24/2020 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $50,000 |
03/17/2020 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $50,000 |
03/15/2020 | Robert Hanson | $1,000 |
03/13/2020 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $50,000 |
03/06/2020 | Benjamin Halper | $1,000 |
03/06/2020 | Kristyn Judkins | $2,500 |
03/06/2020 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $50,000 |
03/03/2020 | Adam Wiggins | $15,000 |
02/25/2020 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $50,000 |
02/07/2020 | Field Trip Psychedelics Inc | $10,000 |
01/21/2020 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $225,000 |
12/20/2019 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $150,000 |
11/19/2019 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $100,000 |
10/18/2019 | New Approach PAC - 527 organization | $10,000 |
08/14/2019 | PSI 2020 (19606) | $58,372 |
--Ben FisherPost Date: 2020-10-08 11:42:14 | Last Update: 2020-10-02 16:01:08 |
More taxes on tobacco and e-cigarettes
Editor's note: This is part two of a multi-part series covering the 2020 Oregon General Election ballot measures.
By far, the most expensive ballot measure this cycle will be
Measure 108 which was referred to the voters by the legislature from
HB 2270. At $13 million, it has remarkably few large contributors. One doesn't have to try hard to envision the healthcare industrial complex taking on the lowly, blue-collar smokers. Since the proceeds of the tax increase go to fund health care for low-income Oregonians, it can be regarded as taxing the poor to pay for their own health care.
One can wonder about the sustainability of funding health care through increased taxes on nicotine. What do we do when it's no longer cool to smoke and revenue declines? If this is such a good idea, why do we need $13 million from the healthcare-industrial complex against virtually no opposition to pass this? Couldn't we have used that $13 million to pay for -- uh, more health care?
This is the official title for the measure, as provided by the Attorney General, as it will appear on the ballot:
Increases cigarette and cigar taxes. Establishes tax on e-cigarettes and nicotine vaping devices. Funds health programs.
Result of 'Yes' Vote: 'Yes' vote increases cigarette tax by $2 per pack. Increases cap on cigar taxes to $1 per cigar. Establishes tax on nicotine inhalant delivery systems, such as e-cigarettes and vaping products. Funds health programs. Approves other provisions.
Result of 'NO' Vote: 'No' vote retains current law. Cigarettes are taxed at current rate of $1.33 per pack. Tax on cigars is capped at 50 cents per cigar. Nicotine inhalant delivery systems, such as e-cigarettes and vaping products, remain untaxed.
Summary: Under current law, a tax of $1.33 is imposed on each pack of 20 cigarettes, cigars are taxed at 65 percent of their wholesale price up to a maximum of 50 cents per cigar, and nicotine inhalant delivery systems, such as e-cigarettes and vaping products, are not taxed. Measure increases the cigarette tax by $2 per pack and increases the maximum tax on cigars to $1 per cigar. Measure provide for smaller cigars (sold commonly as "cigarillos") to be taxed like cigarettes. Measure establishes tax on nicotine inhalant delivery systems, such as e-cigarettes and vaping products, at 65 percent of the wholesale price. Tax on nicotine inhalant delivery systems does not apply to approved tobacco cessation products or to marijuana inhalant delivery systems. Revenue from increased and new taxes will be used to fund health care coverage for low-income families, including mental health services, and to fund public health programs, including prevention and cessation programs, addressing tobacco- and nicotine-related diseases.
Major donations to Yes for a Healthy Future |
Date | Donor | Amount |
09/09/2020 | Oregon Association of Hospitals & Health Systems | $500,000 |
07/13/2020 | American Lung Association | $5,000 |
06/20/2020 | Adventist Health System | $396,580 |
02/08/2020 | PacificSource | $150,000 |
01/15/2020 | American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Inc. | $50,000 |
01/11/2020 | Sky Lakes Medical Center | $352,460 |
12/30/2019 | CareOregon | $150,000 |
12/27/2019 | Oregon Association of Hospitals & Health Systems | $500,000 |
12/02/2019 | Grande Ronde Hospital | $201,400 |
11/27/2019 | Trinity Health | $93,648 |
11/27/2019 | Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics | $857,016 |
11/25/2019 | Samaritan Health Services | $652,560 |
11/20/2019 | Kaiser Permanente - KP Financial Svcs | $919,908 |
11/18/2019 | Legacy Health System CPC, LLC | $1,732,048 |
11/15/2019 | Trinity Health | $169,204 |
11/14/2019 | Nurses United Political Action Committee (12987) | $200,000 |
11/14/2019 | St. Charles Health System | $792,368 |
11/13/2019 | Providence Health & Services | $3,296,948 |
11/12/2019 | PeaceHealth | $1,056,540 |
10/28/2019 | Asante | $904,304 |
--Ben FisherPost Date: 2020-10-07 11:42:14 | Last Update: 2020-10-02 16:00:52 |
Measure 107 would limit free speech in Oregon
Editor's note: This is part one of a multi-part series covering the 2020 Oregon General Election ballot measures.
Ballot measure 107 was referred to the Oregon voters by the 2019 legislature.
Senate Joint Resolution was sponsored by Senators Tim Knopp (R-Bend), Mark Hass (D-Portland), Jeff Golden (D-Ashland), Rob Wagner (D-Lake Oswego), and Representatives Dan Rayfield (D-Corvallis) and Alyssa Keny-Guyer (D-Portland). The resolution is a response to an
Oregon Supreme Court decision which allows the state and inferior jurisdictions to enact campaign finance reforms. Ballot Measure 107 merely updates the Oregon Constitution to reflect that possibility. It does not itself enact any limits.
In the State of Oregon Democrats operate a Super-majority legislature, and much of the agenda for the State is set by them. They would now like to further limit the ability of Grassroots Oregonian's to fund raise.
The Democrats have put forth Measure 107 which "Authorizes the state legislature and local governments to (1) enact laws or ordinances limiting campaign contributions and expenditures; (2) require disclosure of contributions and expenditures; and (3) require that political advertisements identify the people or entities that paid for them."
The referring of this free-speech limiting bill to the November ballot has been largely paid for by in-kind Democrat contributions and Big Union money.
Major donations to Yes for Fair and Honest Elections |
Date | Donor | Amount |
09/28/2020 | North Star Action Center | $3,000 |
09/11/2020 | Team Oregon Victory Fund (19420) | $5,000 |
09/04/2020 | End Citizen's United | $1,200 |
08/31/2020 | Alliance for Democracy Portland | $1,200 |
08/17/2020 | Oregon AFSCME council 75 | $5,000 |
08/16/2020 | Kafoury & McDougal | $2,000 |
08/07/2020 | Norman Turrill | $1,000 |
08/07/2020 | End Citizen's United | $14,000 |
07/27/2020 | Voters' Right to Know | $14,000 |
06/29/2020 | Team Oregon Victory Fund (19420) | $5,000 |
06/02/2020 | Honest Elections Oregon | $5,000 |
06/01/2020 | David Delk | $1,000 |
05/22/2020 | Kafoury & McDougal | $2,500 |
04/20/2020 | AFSCME Council 75 | $10,000 |
04/12/2020 | Thomas Keffer | $1,000 |
The above chart of major donors to the Yes on 107 Campaign, highlights a certain irony. This collection of big donors all are advocating for campaign finance limits. No political action committee has yet been established for the No on 107 effort.
For further irony, one of the biggest defender of not having any campaign finance limits was the American Civil Liberties Union. In
a Friend of the Court brief the ACLU declares a change of heart.
"The ACLU of Oregon has a particular interest in this case because in recent years, the organization’s understanding of the relationship between campaign finance regulation and the freedom of expression enshrined in both the U.S. and Oregon Constitutions has evolved. This reckoning started in 2011, in the wake of Citizens United. ACLU National came to recognize the multiple, deleterious effects of excessive money in politics – including its negative impact on communities historically excluded from meaningful political participation – and reconsidered its previous absolute opposition to any regulation of campaign finance."
This is the official title for the measure, as provided by the Attorney General, as it will appear on the ballot:
Amends Constitution: Allows laws limiting political campaign contributions and
expenditures, requiring disclosure of political campaign contributions and
expenditures, and requiring political campaign advertisements to identify who
paid for them
Result of “Yes†Vote: “Yes†vote allows laws, created by the Legislative Assembly, local governments or voters that limit contributions and expenditures made to influence an election. Allows laws that require disclosure of contributions and expenditures made to influence an election. Allows laws that require campaign or election advertisements to identify who paid for them. Campaign contribution limits cannot prevent effective advocacy. Applies to laws enacted or approved on or after January 1, 2016.
Result of “No†Vote: “No†vote retains current law. Courts currently find the Oregon Constitution does not allow laws limiting campaign expenditures. Laws limiting contributions are allowed if the text of the law does not target expression.
Summary: The Oregon Supreme Court has interpreted the Oregon Constitution to prohibit limits on expenditures made in connection with a political campaign or to influence the outcome of an election. Limits on contributions are allowed if the text of the law does not target expression. The proposed measure amends the Oregon Constitution to allow the Oregon Legislative Assembly, local governments, and the voters by initiative to pass laws that limit contributions and expenditures made in connection with a political campaign and contributions and expenditures made to influence an election. The measure would allow laws that require disclosure of political campaign and election contributions and expenditures. The measure would allow laws that require political campaign and election advertisements to identify who paid for them. Laws limiting campaign contributions cannot prevent effective advocacy. Measure applies to all laws enacted or approved on or after January 1, 2016.
--Ben FisherPost Date: 2020-10-05 11:42:14 | Last Update: 2020-10-04 07:51:46 |
Read More Articles