The Oregon Office of Economic Analysis released the June revenue forecast and economic outlook. Governor Tina Kotek issued a statement in response to the revenue forecast: “While the Trump Administration spreads uncertainty in our economy and our social safety net, I refuse to let Oregon be knocked off of our game. We know the problems we need to solve here at home regardless of the chaos coming out of Washington, D.C.

“Oregonians will come together and take care of each other. I am committed to working diligently with the Legislature from now through the end of the session to make hard budget choices and address our challenges head on, despite the dampening of economic growth.

“Progress requires persistence. There are still too many people sleeping outside. There are not enough houses. There are not enough places to go for care or people to provide that care. Our kids must be served better by our schools. The cost of living is on the rise. These crises don’t take an intermission, so neither can we. All of us need to dig deep, be nimble, and lead with long-term strategy over caution so we can deliver for Oregonians."

It's the first forecast Democrats aren't trying to make the results look rosy instead of heeding the warning of uncertainty. As much as they tried to rosy up past forecasts, they now have someone to blame for their own bad policies that are making Oregon one of the highest taxed states. Kotek's idea that Oregonians should "dig deep" is the policy that created the uncertainty.

Kotek's urge to micromanage the legislature violates the Oregon Constitution on the separation of powers between the three branches. Is she pushing the matter to justify being a dictator? Even the forecast states that fiscal policy could provide material offset. However, the "total available resources are now expected to equal $37.4 billion, which is down $755.7 million from the prior forecast. It should be noted that almost $250 million of this decline is due to increased spending in the current biennium." It seems that this is a constitutional violation of a balanced budget and provides pressure to raise taxes and steel the kicker. Mismanagement of funding can't be blamed on the Trump Administration.

Senate President Rob Wagner (D-Lake Oswego) is blaming President Trump's tariff dealings on a slowdown of the economy. "Oregon's economy is greatly reliant on our international trading partners, and it is clear the tariffs and chaos from the federal administration is making it harder for businesses to plan and slowing economic growth. With this forecast, we are starting to see real impacts to businesses, workers, and state revenues. Legislators must continue with a cautious and prudent approach to balancing the state’s two-year budget, knowing tough choices lie ahead." However, the forecast indicates that Trump's tariffs haven't affect the fiscal forecast except for an accumulation of products in anticipation of a prolonged period of negotiation with particularly China as our top trade country.

To dig the hole deeper, Governor Kotek issued a statement in response to Congressional Republicans' discussion to reform Medicaid to cut costs in waste and fraud. “I am outraged by the proposed Medicaid cuts. It’s a reckless plan that will hurt people and Oregon’s health care system. One in three Oregonians rely on Medicaid – the Oregon Health Plan – for their health insurance. That’s 1.4 million neighbors and loved ones. Their proposal is not just shortsighted – it’s morally indefensible.”

President Trump announced equalization of drug prices. Other countries are setting their prices and telling drug companies to collect the rest from America. Trump said it will cut drug prices from 50 to 90 percent. This will allow Medicare and Medicaid cost to go down. Trump stated, "we will no longer subsidize healthcare for other countries." Robert Kennedy Jr. said, "America has four percent of the world population and pay 75% of healthcare costs."

President Trump has made it clear that no benefits will be affected vowing to improve the program. They are looking for efficiencies to help cover the cost of $4.5 trillion in tax breaks not taxing tips, overtime, and social security benefits.

Senator Ron Wyden, top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, should have fact-checked his statement. He said Trump talked often about helping the middle class while on the campaign trail. “When the campaign is over, they’re back to helping people at the top and paying for it by sticking it to folks of modest means.” He described the Republican tax-cutting plans "back to supercharging trickle-down.” However, the tax cuts are aimed at middle and lower income families.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Last week both Governor Kotek and House Majority Leader Ben Bowman (D-Tigard, Metzger, & S. Beaverton) spoke out against President Trump’s tariff claimed his reckless tariffs alone will cost Oregon families thousands of extra dollars a year. His decisions are putting pressure on wallets and disrupting the industries essential to Oregon’s economy.” Trump's tariff leverage has already reduced the amount of fentanyl coming across the boarder. Kotek should be as concerned, instead she doubles down on being a sanctuary state.

President Trump said he refuses to let the United States be taken advantage of and believes that tariffs are necessary to ensure fair trade, protect American workers, and reduce the trade deficit—this is an emergency. The annual cost to the U.S. economy of counterfeit goods, pirated software, and theft of trade secrets is between $225 billion and $600 billion. Counterfeit products not only pose a significant risk to U.S. competitiveness, but also threaten the security, health, and safety of Americans, with the global trade in counterfeit pharmaceuticals estimated at $4.4 billion and linked to the distribution of deadly fentanyl-laced drugs.

Oregonians are affected by this imbalance, but Governor Kotek doesn't seem to be interested in pursuing this large and persistent trade deficit in both industrial and agricultural goods, offshoring of our manufacturing base, empowered non-market economies like China that hurts Oregon’s middle class and small towns.

Studies have repeatedly shown that tariffs can be an effective tool for reducing or eliminating threats that impair national security and achieving economic and strategic objectives. Instead of spreading millions in litigation, Governor Kotek and AG Rayfield would benefit more for Oregon by modifying policies to take advantage of federal actions.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-05-13 02:00:47

Last Update: 2025-05-15 02:13:27

Oregon House Speaker, Julie Fahey (D-West Eugene and Veneta) refused to move modernization of Oregon’s Sanctuary State law House Bill 3551 for a public hearing. House Republicans took action forcing a vote on the House Floor. The legislation would allow law enforcement agencies in Oregon to work with federal authorities to identify and remove individuals convicted of violent felonies, Class A misdemeanors, and felony sexual offenses. The motion to withdraw the bill from the Judiciary Committee failed despite receiving bipartisan votes, with a majority of House Democrats voting to shield undocumented immigrants who have committed violent crimes from federal law enforcement.

“Our communities should not be sanctuaries for murderers, rapists, and other violent criminals. This bill is a common-sense policy that protects Oregonians by holding the most violent criminals accountable. But common sense isn’t very common in Oregon, as my bill never even got a hearing,” said Rep. Alek Skarlatos (R-Canyonville) who introduced the bill, and made the motion. “Allowing state and local law enforcement to work with federal authorities to identify and remove illegal immigrants and foreign terrorists who are charged with some of the most heinous crimes is too popular and pragmatic for Oregon Democrats.”

The vote follows the announcement from U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi on the largest fentanyl bust in DEA history involving the arrest of a Sinaloa cartel leader, Heriberto Salazar Amaya, an illegal immigrant living in Salem. Authorities say he had been removed from the U.S. twice already.

“Today we had an opportunity to keep our communities safe by denying sanctuary protections to violent criminals, terrorist gangs, and dangerous rapists,” said House Republican Leader Christine Drazan (R-Canby), a sponsor of the bill. “House Democrats blocked common sense legislation that would give law enforcement additional tools and resources to do their jobs and hold violent criminals, in the United States illegally, accountable.”

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Governor Tina Kotek has stated that she “won’t back down” from shielding criminal illegal immigrants operating in Oregon and Attorney General Dan Rayfield recently said that he would not use state resources to keep communities safe from undocumented immigrants who have committed violent crimes. Instead, Rayfield is using state resources to shield violent criminal illegal immigrants.

A statewide poll commissioned by House Republicans revealed that 69% of Oregonians support deporting undocumented immigrants who have been convicted of a crime while in the United States. The statewide poll was conducted by Public Opinion Strategies between January 4–7 of this year, surveying 500 registered Oregon voters with a ±4.38% margin of error.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-05-11 20:44:53

Last Update: 2025-05-12 00:46:47

Oregon House Majority Leader Ben Bowman (D-Tigard, Metzger, & S. Beaverton) points out, it’s been 100 days of President Trump’s second term, to claim that his administration’s policies are already hurting families, businesses, and communities across the state.

Bowman claims, "The Trump administration is creating chaos in Oregon and across the country. He is damaging our economy and increasing the cost of living. Trump’s reckless tariffs alone will cost Oregon families thousands of extra dollars a year. His decisions are putting pressure on wallets and disrupting the industries essential to Oregon’s economy.”

Bowman used the 90-day pause to spout criticism, but now he's in a difficult position. The Trump/UK tariff deal broke the dam and others are lining up. All except China, the U.S number one enemy. Why has Oregon entrusted our economy in China as the top foreign deports, and third on imports? So is Bowman trying to protect China and keep Oregon dependent on China for our economy? Why isn’t Oregon paying more attention to being the supplier instead of adding restrictions on business.

Economists say that the shift is essential because a consumer nation isn’t a nation. There may be a short period of adjustment, but getting production supplies from within the U.S. will increase the supply chain and will grow our economy. It seems that Bowman is advocating for the status quo even if change is what Oregonians want, according to polls.

Earlier this month, The Oregonian reported a federal freeze on $225 million in grants has endangered vital clean water initiatives and emergency preparedness programs, critical to the health and safety of Oregonians. Nearly three dozen projects in Oregon are on the chopping block for money from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Federal Emergency Management Agency. Federal officials effectively halted the grants and local leaders worry the money will never arrive in Oregon.

Bowman claims Oregon is not standing idly by, but have passed six bills fighting for affordability. However, what the Trump administration is looking for are violations of the constitutional law in equality or reverse discrimination that was confirmed in the Supreme Court’s Chevron decision. Democrats introduced at least 24 bills in violation. Bills that would have made corrections, such as no males in female sports, they blocked.

Bowman defends their stand: “Across the state, thousands have taken to the streets in peaceful protest, demonstrating their opposition to these reckless policies. Governor Tina Kotek, Attorney General Dan Rayfield, and Oregon House Democrats are holding the line against federal overreach — defending our values of fairness, opportunity, and inclusion.”

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Oregon House Democrats are urging all Oregonians to get involved, but apparently only to “push back against harmful federal policies and deliver a stronger, more resilient Oregon for future generations.” It seems they want Oregonians to break constitutional laws so they won’t be the only ones and they can hide in the numbers.

They suggest engaging with your community and participate in community events and initiatives to make your voice heard. Then ask why they want to vote for keeping the status quo while businesses are leaving the state and projected to continue to leave for the next five years, why support schools that are failing our kids, and why Oregon is one of the highest taxed states with nothing to show for it.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-05-09 23:04:32

Last Update: 2025-05-10 00:06:11

Senate Bill 947, sponsored by Senator James Manning (D-Eugene/Springfield) passed the Senate on partisan line with zero testimony in support. The bill as amended changes the term "militia" in the state statutes to "National Guard" and removes all mention of the “unorganized militia” from statutes.

Despite Mannings claim on the Senate floor that the bill was bi-partisan, he either doesn’t know what bi-partisan means or he deliberately lied.

Kevin Starrett, OFF Director, stated, “clearly the effort is to eliminate the very notion of a citizen militia. Something that actually exists and has for the entire history of our country. Why? Because the far left sponsors want to remind the people of Oregon that all force and power rests with the state and that they, the people, are mere subjects.”

Oregon law defines the “unorganized militia” as “… all able-bodied residents of the state between the ages of 18 and 45 who are not serving in any force of the organized militia or who are not on the state retired list and who are or who have declared their intention to become citizens of the United States; subject, however, to such exemptions from military duty as are created by the laws of the United States.

Starrett stated, “Manning has managed to draft a bill that has exactly NO support from anyone except imbecile Democrat legislators. 100% of submitted testimony is in opposition to this nonsense. That’s quite an accomplishment.”

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

The 'militia" are the people. And that terrifies the left. And they will do all they can to crush it. This bill is one more attempt to remind Oregonians that they are subjects and not citizens. The fact that there isn’t one testimony in support and 270 in opposition. The Oregon Constitution indirectly states a duty to represent the people with a structure and principles within the constitution that legislators are expected to act in the best interest of their constituents. To totally ignore the people shows their arrogance and hunger for power. Oregonians need to ask if they should be trusted.

Follow at Oregon Citizens Lobby Alerts. The House has schedule a work session for May 13.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-05-08 02:00:07

Last Update: 2025-05-09 18:19:29

Senate Bill 1098 passed the Senate with one Republican vote from Senator Dick Anderson (R-Lincoln City) and is scheduled for a public hearing in the House Committee on Education. It will legalize pornography in school literature that is otherwise illegal. Democrat sponsors say that isn’t true since there is a process to justify removal or purchase that involves a committee.

Studies show that pornography is the most addictive substance, even worse than cocaine. That's because it is never satisfied, and always wants to go to the next level until it reaches rape and murder.

The younger the exposure, the higher the risk. Study shows 86% of boys and 51% of girls are exposed to porn before 18 and some at young as 8 years old. Viewing porn alters the development of dopamine centers shifting and changing their norms and standards. This affects their adult life, depriving them of intimacy, reducing their ability to be aroused by their spouse, robbing them of a satisfying marriage and family life. This bill plays political suicide with children lives. They want to blame guns for an increase in suicides in young people, but this exposes them to what has been proven to be improper and destructive life altering behavior. This will be another reason to homeschool and make public schools less desirable.

The State Library reports there were 20 challenges to literature across the state but many went unreported and solved internally. A clear pattern has emerged in recent OIFC reports: incidents and challenged materials are disproportionately about, by, or center around the stories of individuals who belong to an underrepresented protected class under ORS 659.850. In 2023-24, 87% of the items challenged told the stories of one or more underrepresented groups. 66% of challenged materials focused on 2SLGBTQIA+ people, while 22% were centered on Black, Indigenous, or people of color. This bill seems to be a challenge to our discrimination statues exposing vulnerabilities, and how it has conditioned us, forced us, to be tolerant of immorality.

ORS 336.455 curriculum requirements for human sexuality education must include promoting abstinence for school-age youth and mutually monogamous relationships with an uninfected partner for adults as the most effective way to prevent pregnancy and the transmission of STDs. However, abstinence may not be taught to the exclusion of other material and instruction on contraceptive and disease reduction measures.

It also requires a balanced, accurate information and skills-based learning on the risks and benefits of contraceptive and disease reduction measures. The mandates in ORS 336.035, 336.455 and 336.465, as well a ORS 581-022-2030 and 581-022-2050 authorizes the school district as the body to make choices of literature that are age-appropriate, based on best practices that are proven theory and practices.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Sex education courses must also include information on teen dating violence and “must be presented in a manner sensitive to the fact that there are students who have experienced sexual abuse” and must not devalue or ignore students who have engaged in sexual intercourse. Parents or guardians may remove their children from sex education via a opt-out policy.

SB 1098 applies to teachers with a classroom library, and purchase of textbooks and instructional material. It totally destroys all these safe guards crafted to protect students. Since a school library is defined as part of the educational infrastructure that supports learning, the bill conflicts with the statutes for sex education standards. To give students free reign of sexual materials in the library that does not comply with instructional standards and without parents’ knowledge or opt-out option is in violation and should not be permitted.

Placing temptations in school libraries that would be a crime if anyone on the street were to show these books to a child may lead to other crimes. It opens the door to more experimentation for students and headlines like "St. Helens High School teachers arrested on charges of sexual abuse of students".

Sponsors further don't want any challenges from voters to override their illegal, unethical, and immoral actions by adding an emergency clause to the bill. What constitutes an emergency in a bill that needs preplanning for school boards to enact policies, isn't justified. Testimony can be submitted until 3pm on May 2. Track on Oregon Citizens Lobby Alerts.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-29 17:59:14

Last Update: 2025-04-30 00:54:27

The Oregon Supreme Court issued an opinion on April 24, 2025 on State v. Lee, which reversed the Court of Appeals and the circuit court.

The case as described by Justia Daily: “An informant informed law enforcement that a person named "Tom Collins" was dealing heroin from a residence in Albany, Oregon. Detectives planned to use the informant in a controlled buy at the residence. Instead of waiting for the results of the controlled buy to apply for a warrant, the detectives applied for and obtained a search warrant that anticipated the controlled buy. The state argued that the warrant was an "anticipatory warrant" as approved by the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Grubbs. The defendant argued that such warrants are incompatible with Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution.”

Article I, section 9 is the “Bill of Rights” and Section 9 is Unreasonable searches or seizures. No law shall violate the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search, or seizure; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath, or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or thing to be seized.

“The Linn County Circuit Court denied the defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained from the search, ruling that anticipatory warrants were valid under both the Oregon and U.S. Constitutions. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision, concluding that anticipatory warrants were permissible under Article I, section 9, and that the affidavit established probable cause.

“The Oregon Supreme Court reviewed the case and declined to address the constitutional question. Instead, the court focused on Oregon's statutory warrant requirements, specifically ORS 133.555(2) and ORS 133.545(6). The court concluded that the affidavit in support of the warrant failed to comply with ORS 133.545(6), which requires that the facts and circumstances show that the objects of the search are in the places to be searched at the time of the warrant's issuance.”

ORS 133.545(6) The application shall consist of a proposed warrant in conformance with ORS 133.565 (Contents of search warrant), and shall be supported by one or more affidavits particularly setting forth the facts and circumstances tending to show that the objects of the search are in the places, or in the possession of the individuals, to be searched. If an affidavit is based in whole or in part on hearsay, the affiant shall set forth facts bearing on any unnamed informant’s reliability and shall disclose, as far as possible, the means by which the information was obtained.

“As a result, the warrant did not comply with ORS 133.555(2), and the trial court erred in denying the defendant's motion to suppress.”

ORS 133.555(2) If the judge finds that the application meets the requirements of ORS 133.545 (Issuance of search warrant) and that, on the basis of the record made before the judge, there is probable cause to believe that the search will discover things specified in the application and subject to seizure under ORS 133.535 (Permissible objects of search and seizure), the judge shall issue a search warrant based on the finding of the judge and in accordance with the requirements of ORS 133.545 (Issuance of search warrant) to 133.615 (Return of the warrant). If the judge does not so find, the judge shall deny the application.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

This case exposes how the Oregon legislature has repeatedly passed laws that conflict with the constitutions. The Supreme Court continually refuses to deal with the conflict between the Oregon and U.S. Constitutions verses Oregon statutes by repeatedly overturning the lower courts. Recently they overturned the decision against Measure 114 restricting the right to bear arms for defense.

The legislature could have corrected the conflict in this case when amending HB 2473, but instead they eliminated added warrant authorizations and switched it to repealing the manner of committing the crime of harassment, and requiring a phlebotomist to withdraw blood for evidence of driving under the influence.

Perhaps the Supreme Court doesn’t want to expose multiple legislative conflicts because they hold their purse strings. Justice Flynn has submitted SB 96 giving the Supreme Court judges a $100,000 raise and equivalent raises for lower courts with a $33.3 Million impact on the General Fund. It is currently being reviewed by Ways and Means.

The fact that the Supreme Court didn’t include the constitution in their decision, which takes priority, should be disturbing to all Oregonians. Now there is a known heroin dealer back in action.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-26 12:08:29

Last Update: 2025-04-25 18:22:52

Governor Tina Kotek announced a $10 million investment in artificial intelligence (AI) workforce development alongside a new Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the State of Oregon and NVIDIA to expand AI education and skill-building.

“AI is transforming the way we live and work, and Oregon should not be left behind,” Governor Kotek said. “This collaboration with NVIDIA helps us meet the moment. Oregon will not only prepare our workers, businesses, and public service professionals for a prosperous future, we will lead the way.”

“AI has ushered in a new industrial revolution, and governments, educators and partners are racing to shape a world where everyone can thrive through technology and AI training,” said Louis Stewart, Head of Strategic Initiatives at NVIDIA. “Through this new collaboration, Oregon will have access to the NVIDIA technologies it needs to upskill and empower its workforce to innovate, compete and grow its economy.”

The MOU establishes a collaborative framework for Oregon and NVIDIA to foster entrepreneurship, expand AI-focused education and skill-building to prepare Oregonians for the future, and help state agencies identify ways to responsibly use AI to improve government services.

The initiative is to collaborate with Oregon’s higher education institutions to develop a comprehensive AI training programs to equip students with practical skills in AI, machine learning, and data science; and facilitate hands-on learning experiences about NVIDIA’s cutting-edge technologies. The MOU mentions AI frameworks and simulation tools, with a specific focus on applications in semiconductor design, microelectronics, and renewable energy solutions, which will be new for NVIDIA. Their expertise has been in gaming and graphics.

Included in the objectives, there is mention of:

• Advance Oregon’s economic competitiveness and global leadership in industries like renewable energy, smart cities, and precision agriculture.
• Focus on addressing challenges in climate resilience, healthcare analytics, renewable energy optimization, and smart city infrastructure while ensuring Oregon remains a leader in AI innovation.
• Ensure these programs center the needs of and prioritize accessibility for underserved and rural communities to create equitable workforce development opportunities.
• Engage a diverse set of stakeholders—including academic institutions, businesses, startups, and community organizations—to ensure equitable access to AI education, resources, and technologies.

As part of the collaboration, NVIDIA will work with the Higher Education Coordinating Commission (HECC) and Oregon’s colleges and universities to launch an AI Ambassador Program, which will place trained ambassadors across Oregon campuses to provide hands-on training and mentorship to students. The work will be overseen by a steering committee composed of state and industry representatives.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

“We are excited for this strategic collaboration with NVIDIA that will help position Oregon higher education institutions and workforce training providers to lead in preparing students for responsible application of AI and cutting-edge technologies needed in Oregon,” HECC Director Ben Cannon said. “This highly collaborative and tailored approach to training, innovation and research for some of the most high-demand fields in Oregon is designed to drive economic growth and open doors for diverse Oregonians to high-paying careers.”

A metrics for workforce development is keyed on the percentage increase in participation from underrepresented groups, including rural and economically disadvantaged populations. Outcome measurements include enrollment rates in these programs, with data on participation from underrepresented groups, the number of scholarships or financial aid opportunities provided to economically disadvantaged students pursuing AI-related programs, and the increase in participation rates of individuals from underrepresented groups in Oregon’s AI education and workforce initiatives.

Alongside the MOU, the Governor is directing $10 million in available Oregon CHIPS Act funding to Oregon’s Semiconductor Talent Sustaining Fund, established in 2023 in Senate Bill 4. SB 4 limits the Governor’s discretion to $50,000 for a single grant with preferences given to businesses owned by members of underrepresented communities and economically disadvantaged individuals.

Oregon House passed the $210 million Oregon CHIPS Act, which includes $190 million in direct grants and loans for semiconductor companies seeking federal funding to expand in Oregon, as well as $10 million for research at universities and $10 million to help with land development costs. Furthermore, the U.S. Commerce Department is releasing federal CHIPS Act funding in stages, and Oregon is expected to receive more of the billions in yet-to-be-distributed funds, if they clean up their act.

The MOU obligates Oregon to provide sustained investment in modernizing research facilities, encourage expansion, and fostering AI innovation hubs to ensure Oregon institutions remain globally competitive. "The investment will support workforce development projects tied to semiconductor and AI sectors, with a focus on training Oregonians – especially those from underrepresented communities – for high paying careers."

Instead of revising policies that don't meet new standards, it seems like Governor Kotek is playing double-dare with the Trump Administration at every turn. Oregonians are disenfranchised over socialist policies that discriminate picking winners and losers. Let Governor Kotek know how you feel.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-25 15:47:37

Last Update: 2025-04-25 17:58:15

Beaverton parent, Jeff Myers of Save Oregon Schools has filed a lawsuit against the Beaverton School District over student privacy, parental rights, and a public school system that is increasingly operating without transparency or consent.

In January 2025, Beaverton School District quietly launched a new digital hall pass system (DHP) at eight of its middle schools. Students are now required to submit digital requests before leaving class for basic needs like using the restroom, going to the nurse, or accessing their locker. Teachers must approve the request, and the system logs the destination, time, and duration of each pass. These records are stored indefinitely in the district's Synergy Student Information System (SIS).

Myers says, “The DHP system is being actively used for behavioral monitoring and intervention. Staff teams regularly analyze student hall pass data to identify "top users" – students who leave class more frequently than average. These students may be flagged and referred to counselors or behavior specialists, often before parents are notified or involved.” Myers became concerned after his daughter displayed anxiety over this system being installed at her school, and decided to file a lawsuit.

The lawsuit asks the court to:

• Immediately suspend the use of the digital hall pass system district-wide;
• Prevent further collection and analysis of DHP data;
• Require the district to submit an inventory of the data collected through the system;
• Permanently purge all previously collected data;
• Affirm the rights of parents to be notified and provide meaningful consent before schools launch systems that collect and/or act on sensitive behavioral data.

Myers’ lawsuit argues that the district's actions violate both federal and Oregon law. Key claims include:

• The Fourteenth Amendment: Parents have a constitutional right to direct the upbringing and medical decisions of their children.
• ORS 336.184 & ORS 336.187: These laws require schools to notify parents and provide opt-out rights for behavioral or health-related screenings.
• ORS 326.565: Governs student educational records and restricts access to those with a legitimate educational interest.

The district has tried to justify the system under the doctrine of in loco parentis, but the lawsuit claims public schools are government actors and cannot override parental rights without due process.

Myers says: “The district has positioned this system as a solution to behavioral challenges in middle schools. But what they’re not saying is that these challenges were in large part created by their own policies. Over a decade ago, Beaverton phased out traditional disciplinary frameworks in favor of restorative justice, which has often led to inconsistent enforcement and a breakdown in accountability. Rather than confront this reality and reevaluate their discipline model, the district has doubled down—choosing to surveil every student instead.

“These systems are being marketed as modern tools for classroom management. But in practice, they function as behavioral surveillance networks that track kids in ways most parents are never told about.”

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

The lawsuit states: "This is not a digitized bathroom pass. It’s a behavioral surveillance platform that profiles students without their knowledge, and certainly without ours as parents."

This is not just a Beaverton issue. The DHP system impacts more than 6,400 students and was implemented without any meaningful explanation, opt-out process, or oversight. It’s becoming a nationwide trend to market the system as a tool to control every child, and not provide help to the few who misbehave. “That’s not innovation—it’s institutional overreach,” Myers says. “If your district isn’t using something like this yet, it might be next.”

Myers offers suggestion to parents wanting to question their child's school or school board.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-25 14:51:09

Last Update: 2025-04-25 17:57:27

The Oregon Senate Democrat Majority are claiming a victory in a 28 to 1 bipartisan vote on Senate Bill 1191. “Oregonians can inform others of their constitutional and civil rights without being guilty of interfering with law enforcement.” The bill was introduced in the Senate by Senator James Manning Jr.(D-Eugene/Springfield) and Senator Sara Gelser Blouin (D-Albany)

Democrats released this statement: “Rights granted in the United States Constitution and the Oregon Constitution include freedoms of speech and association along with rights to due process and to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.” If the constitution already contains these rights, then what is the necessity of this bill? Could it be that the courts have gone rogue? And what about Second Amendment protections against “unreasonable searches and seizures” absent in SB 243, SB 3075 and SB 3076?

Under Senate Bill 1191, telling people about these rights does not qualify as the crimes of obstructing government and judicial processes or preventing law enforcement from performing their duties. However, the bill lacks where to draw the line of when vocal instruction becomes an obstruction. Does screaming in the face of an officer the advice to a detainee cross the line?

The Senate, according to the Democrats, acted on the bill knowing the federal administration has boasted about deploying law enforcement to punish political opposition. This presumption is mal-information, a false statement to bolster their position. The federal administration has repeatedly stated, they will only seek out criminal activity. To interpret that as punishing political opposition” is false.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

“If you see someone being questioned, it’s okay to say, ‘Hey you have the right to an attorney,’” said Senator James I. Manning, Jr (D – Eugene, Elmira & Veneta), chief sponsor of the measure. “It’s not against the law as long as no one physically intervenes. Free speech is what this is about, and we need to defend it against growing threats.”

We’ve all heard of “ambulance chasers”. Those people have a legitimate license. This bill opens the door for illegitimate chasers, no license required. In Oregon, it isn’t just interfering with judicial administration, it’s the unauthorized practice of law (UPL) can also include impersonating a lawyer providing advice, even if the person is not charging for their services. Federal law forbids unauthorized immigration consultants or "notarios" who provide immigration advice on specific situations can be prosecuted under federal law.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-20 19:48:19

Last Update: 2025-04-20 20:58:30

On Tuesday, House Republicans forced a vote on the House Floor for legislation that would lower taxes for the most tax-burdened Oregonians, including middle class income tax cuts and ‘No Tax on Tips.’ Republicans also forced a vote on the repeal of Oregon’s hidden sales tax on businesses and consumers, also known as the Corporate Activity Tax (CAT).

“Today we pursued tax relief that empowers families to keep more of what they earn,” said House Republican Leader Christine Drazan (R-Canby). “Despite these missed opportunities, House Republicans remain committed to making Oregon more affordable and will continue to use every tool to lower the cost of living and improve the quality of life in our beautiful state.”

From the time the Democrat House Caucus announced their priorities. The Republican Caucus has tried to help them meet their goals to increase prosperity, make Oregon more affordable, make Oregon safer and healthier, and protect rights and freedoms. House Majority Leader Ben Bowman (D-Tigard, Metzger, & S. Beaverton) said, “The legislature’s job is to improve Oregonians’ lives...and the values-driven leaders in our caucus will work hard to deliver results for working people." The Republican House gave Democrats an opportunity to advance their priorities.

Legislation to cut taxes and address the cost of living for working Oregonians include:

• HB 3753 – Income Tax Cut
• HB 3914 – No Tax on Tips
• HB 2033 – Repeal Oregon’s Hidden Sales Tax (CAT)

House Democratic Leadership strategically permitted some Democratic members to vote for the motions, while blocking a path to a majority vote using what has been dubbed a “hall pass.” The motion on all three measures ultimately failed.

“Today, on Tax Day, this body missed an opportunity to help the working poor in our state by making Oregon more affordable. Passing this bill would lower income taxes for hard-working Oregonians who earn lower wages,” said Rep. E. Werner Reschke (R-Klamath Falls), chief sponsor of HB 3753 and Vice Chair of the House Revenue Committee. “It seems like just what the doctor ordered in a world still riddled with inflated costs.”

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

“By eliminating taxes on tips today, we could have sent the message to Oregonians that we entrust them with more economic freedom. But instead, this body decided to tell them that once again, we think the government knows best,” said Rep. Lucetta Elmer (R-McMinnville), chief sponsor of HB 3914 and Deputy House Republican Leader. “I fundamentally disagree with this notion.”

“We can’t tax our businesses into prosperity,” said Rep. Boomer Wright (R-Reedsport) chief sponsor of HB 2033. “Repealing the CAT Tax would eliminate Oregon’s hidden sales tax on businesses and consumers, which would incentivize job growth and get rising costs under control. Oregonians have been taxed enough and today we missed a huge opportunity to ease the tax burden. It’s time to neuter the CAT.”

On April 1st, House Republicans hand-delivered a letter to House Speaker Julie Fahey requesting fair hearings, work sessions, and a Floor vote on priority cost-of-living legislation that would provide desperate relief for Oregonians. As of April 15th, House Republicans have not received a response.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-20 12:44:45

Last Update: 2025-04-20 20:19:14

On Tuesday, House Republicans forced a vote on the House Floor for legislation that would lower taxes for the most tax-burdened Oregonians, including middle class income tax cuts and ‘No Tax on Tips.’ Republicans also forced a vote on the repeal of Oregon’s hidden sales tax on businesses and consumers, also known as the Corporate Activity Tax (CAT).

“Today we pursued tax relief that empowers families to keep more of what they earn,” said House Republican Leader Christine Drazan (R-Canby). “Despite these missed opportunities, House Republicans remain committed to making Oregon more affordable and will continue to use every tool to lower the cost of living and improve the quality of life in our beautiful state.”

From the time the Democrat House Caucus announced their priorities. The Republican Caucus has tried to help them meet their goals to increase prosperity, make Oregon more affordable, make Oregon safer and healthier, and protect rights and freedoms. House Majority Leader Ben Bowman (D-Tigard, Metzger, & S. Beaverton) said, “The legislature’s job is to improve Oregonians’ lives...and the values-driven leaders in our caucus will work hard to deliver results for working people." The Republican House gave Democrats an opportunity to advance their priorities, but uniting on the same goal seems to be out of the question.

Legislation to cut taxes and address the cost of living for working Oregonians presented on the House Floor:

• HB 3753 – Income Tax Cut
• HB 3914 – No Tax on Tips
• HB 2033 – Repeal Oregon’s Hidden Sales Tax (CAT)

House Democratic Leadership strategically permitted some Democratic members to vote for the motions, while blocking a path to a majority vote using what has been dubbed a “hall pass.” The motion on all three measures ultimately failed.

“Today, on Tax Day, this body missed an opportunity to help the working poor in our state by making Oregon more affordable. Passing this bill would lower income taxes for hard-working Oregonians who earn lower wages,” said Rep. E. Werner Reschke (R-Klamath Falls), chief sponsor of HB 3753 and Vice Chair of the House Revenue Committee. “It seems like just what the doctor ordered in a world still riddled with inflated costs.”

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

“By eliminating taxes on tips today, we could have sent the message to Oregonians that we entrust them with more economic freedom. But instead, this body decided to tell them that once again, we think the government knows best,” said Rep. Lucetta Elmer (R-McMinnville), chief sponsor of HB 3914 and Deputy House Republican Leader. “I fundamentally disagree with this notion.”

“We can’t tax our businesses into prosperity,” said Rep. Boomer Wright (R-Reedsport) chief sponsor of HB 2033. “Repealing the CAT Tax would eliminate Oregon’s hidden sales tax on businesses and consumers, which would incentivize job growth and get rising costs under control. Oregonians have been taxed enough and today we missed a huge opportunity to ease the tax burden. It’s time to neuter the CAT.”

On April 1st, House Republicans hand-delivered a letter to House Speaker Julie Fahey requesting fair hearings, work sessions, and a Floor vote on priority cost-of-living legislation that would provide desperate relief for Oregonians. As of April 15th, House Republicans have not received a response.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-17 11:44:45

Last Update: 2025-04-17 00:13:09

Governor Tina Kotek convened Oregon businesses to discuss the potential impacts of President Trump’s U.S. tariffs on all countries and territories that went into effect earlier this month, as well as a series of other tariffs his administration has threatened to enact. Following the meeting, Governor Kotek and Business Oregon launched a survey to hear directly from Oregon businesses.

Governor Kotek stated: “Oregon has one of the most trade-dependent economies in the nation. What business owners need right now is stability and predictability. President Trump’s 10% minimum tariff was one of the most drastic trade decisions since 1930. Had these tariffs been in place on Oregon's $28.2 billion in imported goods last year, companies in Oregon would have had an additional $7.4 billion tax bill to pay." She must mean $2.8 billion, but the idea is to buy American that will expand the U.S. economy, which will result in a return back to Oregonians in increased jobs and wages.

Kotek continues, “Though little will be known about the impacts of the tariffs for several months, I want to raise awareness about the effect on Oregon businesses because business owners and families who are already struggling to make ends meet are forced to live with uncertainty while the price of everyday goods like groceries keep climbing.

“That’s why I brought together Oregon businesses from across sectors, the State Treasurer, the State Economist, and Business Oregon to discuss everything we know today, understand what the top concerns are, and how the state can be an ally in this fight. And I am eager to hear from more businesses, which is why Business Oregon is launching a survey. To our businesses –your success is Oregon’s success, and we are in this together.”

If it's stability that's desired, Kotek should listen to the reasons businesses would leave the state. A University of Oregon Institute for Policy Research and Engagement School of Planning, Public Policy, and Management, says in a report that thousands of potential jobs and billions of potential private investments have been lost to Oregon in the past five years and the state will lose even more in the next five years. A number of businesses indicated they were choosing to relocate because of tax and regulatory burdens, problems associated with attracting and retaining talent, combined with an unfavorable business climate. The report indicates Oregon businesses are being actively recruited because of the poor business environment. Tariffs will settle at a more advantageous level, but tariffs won't cause businesses to relocate out-ot-state.

U.S. tariffs are taxes paid by companies in the U.S. when they purchase tariffed goods coming from outside the country. The new tariffs in place today, including a 145% tariff on goods from China and 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, along with 10% for all other countries and territories, amount to the combined equivalent of a 26% sales tax on imported goods coming into Oregon. This new tax significantly increases the cost of inputs for Oregon manufacturers and can ultimately significantly increase costs for Oregonians.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

In response, the Governor convened the following Oregon business executives:

• Trey Winthrop, CEO, Bob's Red Mill
• Todd Nelson, Co-owner, Bountiful Farms Nursery
• Steve Gibbs, VP of Government Affairs, Columbia Distributing
• Paul Durant, Owner and General Manager, Durant Vineyards & Olive Oil Mill
• Dave Dillon, President, Food Northwest
• Jeff Stone, Executive Director/CEO, Oregon Association of Nurseries
• Nick Edwards, Vice President, Oregon International Port of Coos Bay Commission
• Curtis Robinhold, Executive Director, Port of Portland
• Emma Mcilroy, CEO, Wildfang
• Lisa Charpilloz Hanson, Director, Oregon Department of Agriculture

Oregon State Treasurer Elizabeth Steiner said, “The administration’s tariffs are an unwanted and unnecessary tax that many Oregonians can’t afford. Too many Oregonians are reeling from seeing their college, retirement, and home buying savings eroded by this avoidable turmoil in the market. Too many businesses are seeing their supply chains disrupted, their plans frozen, and their bottom lines battered by tariffs no one outside the administration asked for. I urge the Trump Administration to change coursbute and end these reckless trade wars once and for all.”

In addition to the Governor’s roundtable discussion, Business Oregon is launching a brief survey to hear directly from Oregon companies regarding tariffs and global trade. Small- and medium-sized businesses currently engaged in global trade are encouraged to participate.

Overall, while some businesses might be faced with economic headwinds due to the tariffs, the majority has the potential to benefit from increased domestic manufacturing and potential employment, return of 'made in Oregon' pride, and overall economic growth.


--Donna Bleiler

Post Date: 2025-04-16 17:09:22

Last Update: 2025-04-16 19:06:24